The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
My opinion is no, it should not be added, because it says more about what's happening in Gaza and nothing about the book itself. In other words, the proposed addition is slanted towards a particular point of view on the Gaza conflict. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it was William L. Shirer who reported that ‘Mein Kampf’ had massive sales after Hitler’s rise to power because many Germans felt they would be politically beyond suspicion if they displayed a copy in their homes. Most admitted that they found it unreadable. 124.171.238.229 (talk) 08:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Hitler did not write the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, this attribution should be removed. They existed long before his rise to power, as discussed in the Wiki article about the Protocols. Nobody Special999 (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: The sentence continues "Hitler also wrote that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a fabricated text that purported to expose a Jewish plot to control the world, was an authentic document." Cannolis (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 03:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not done: The sentence continues "Hitler also wrote that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a fabricated text that purported to expose a Jewish plot to control the world, was an authentic document." Cannolis (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)