Talk:Michael Czugaj

Michael Czugaj was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2011	Articles for deletion	No consensus
December 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Queensland / Crime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Michael Czugaj is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Michael Czugaj be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Pronunciation

How do you say this suckers name?--Steven X 02:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shoo-guy. 58.178.95.43 05:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Stuff.

Should we add something about how he's lucky he didn't appeal further, and therefore escaped a possible death penalty? 58.178.95.43 05:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. See No original research. -- Longhair 06:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Michael Czugaj/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 00:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see many issues throughout the article. Here are some:

The first sentence reads like something out of a sensationalist newspaper with how the words are placed. Reword in a way most other articles have it.
"Czugaj was an apprentice glazier, keen surfer, one of eight children." Reword to make the sentence cleaner.
"Subsequent to the criminal proceedings in Bali, in 2008 Czugaj's older brother, Richard, pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to 18 months jail.[6]" I'm not convinced this is needed in the article, given it's not about Michael directly. Either way, the paragraph has some tone problems that are evident in the rest of the article, which causes problems.
"A subsequent appeal for a more lenient sentence was upheld on 26 April 2006." should be cited.
There are parts where the articles talks a lot more about the Bali Nine itself than the person. It's not too bad, but be careful about not going into too much of a tangent.
The citation needed has to be addressed.
There's not much on his early life. There's a bit, but it reads a bit cryptically, and ideally more could be found.
There are a few deadlinks in the article to fix: see here.
Many of the issues brought up in the two reviewed before this seem to apply here as well.

While this isn't an exhaustive list of issues, it's enough to tell me that the article should be failed outright, mainly due to the tone and tangent issues, though this article doesn't seem as bad as a couple others I read. Once everything I noted is addressed, it would be best to put the article up for peer review first. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Czugaj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927005717/http://www.usp.com.au/fpss/case-bali9-michael_czugaj.html to http://www.usp.com.au/fpss/case-bali9-michael_czugaj.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]