Jump to content

Talk:Miranda Grell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leyton or Leyton ward?

[edit]

There are pages for Leyton and Leyton (ward). The Leyton page has more info but the Leyton ward is probably more appropriate (for now I have moved the link to the ward). I do not know if the area known as Leyton and the boundaries of ward are the same - anyone with local knowledge? Ned de Rotelande 16:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm surprised an article for the ward is notable, but a link there does seem more appropriate than to Leyton, yes. Bondegezou 17:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ned, your correct she is(was) the councillor for Leyton Ward which is and area smaller than Leyton town (which covers several wards and roughtly the E10 and part fo e15 post codes)so the link should be to the Leyton ward as her role has no bearing on neibouring wards. Laddo, Leyton
Thanks for the clarification, Laddo Ned de Rotelande 16:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedrutland (talkcontribs)

Maurice Burgess

[edit]

I don't see the relevance of Maurice Burgess's case to Miranda Grell. He was not convicted while a councillor, the conviction did not lead to him losing his seat legally (as Grell's will - if she does not appeal successfully) and his offence was not electoral and predated his election. Therefore I removed the See Also link. Ned de Rotelande 20:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, also see Talk:Maurice Burgess where preliminaries to an AFD discussion are going on for that article and personally I hope it will be deleted for non-notability. MarkThomas 17:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Change article focus?

[edit]

Under WP:BLP1E, should we change this article to be about the ROPA case rather than about the person? Bondegezou (talk) 22:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nedrutland, thanks for your recent edits. What do you think about this proposal? It seems to me that Grell is only notable because of the ROPA case, ergo would it not be more appropriate (and fairer to Ms Grell) to re-work the article to be about that case? Bondegezou (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would have no problem with that; as you say Ms Grell is not otherwise notable. Nedrutland (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Do you or anyone else know the appropriate OSCOLA format for titling the case? I'll also ask in WP:LAW. Bondegezou (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Miranda Grell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Miranda Grell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]