Jump to content

Talk:Monster Blood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Goosebumps -3 monster blood.jpg

[edit]

Image:Goosebumps -3 monster blood.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Monster Blood, Monster Blood II, Monster Blood III and Monster Blood IV articles do not present a lot of information. Combined into one article, it would still be a reasonable size. As such, I recommend that this article deal with the entire Monster Blood saga and not just the first book in that saga. Neelix (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should we mention that in Beware of the purple peanut butter, the purple peanut butter could be purple monster blood? it causes shrinking, is jelly-like and theres a small amount. if not could you include it into a trivia section..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.174.110.177 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]