Talk:Motorola Atrix 4G

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Moses, Asher (2011-05-06). "Motorola Atrix makes a splash but Xoom has its work cut out". The Sydney Morning Herald's Digital Life.

Are we sure it's supposed to be released in Q1 of 2010? Because that was quite a few months ago and the article says it was just introduced... Bped1985 (talk) 06:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article since there is a better onee "motorola atrix 4g" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.73.74.49 (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I redirected it to the 4g article. — Ganeshk (talk) 22:27, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The official Motorola site calls it Motorola Atrix 4G. Can the nominator show where it is being called Motorola Atrix? — Ganeshk (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Atrix (without 4G) will be the name in Canada [1] (we don't call non 4G networks 4G here) and probably in the UK and other countries as well. --zorxd (talk) 19:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official moto link as well: [2]. I also think that we should explain the 4G issue in the article. This is not a 4G phone. This is a HSPA+ 14.4 Mbps phone branded as 4G in the US. --zorxd (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Introduced" webtop?

The Motorola Atrix did not "introduce the concept" of webtop in any sense of the word. According to Wikipedia's own article, web desktops have been around since at least 1994. LeftClicker (talk) 23:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Is it just me or is the image on the front page not there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.67.89.60 (talk) 08:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Connectivity - LTE

All the material from AT&T and Motorola say that Atrix is 4G in HSPA+ at 14.4Mbps. No mention of LTE.

I think LTE is not supported and hence that should be removed from connectivity section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.98.22 (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1080p Recording support

Updated "Specification Highlights" to reflect the times... Namely that the dev community got tired of waiting for motorola and released a modified Android package based on an existing Olympus Camera packaged. Cited http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1079760

-FakeBritishGuy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.192.98.83 (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Microphone as input method

Why the two microphones are not listed as data input methods? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.16.211.66 (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace the first picture

It not only show the device running CyanogenMod 7, but it also shows custom settings on CM7! We should be showing pictures of stock Motoblur, people! --Mather1 (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying you're wrong, but, why change it? The article is about the hardware with an open source OS. The pic is too. Would you rather see GB? or Froyo? ICS (apparently 3rd quarter this yr)? Tough to decide what the "right" pic is, I don't think any of them would necessarily be wrong though. Arguments could be made for each, it was shipped with Froyo originally I think. Doing away with the lockscreen would make it look stock wouldn't it? -- Despayre ^{tête-à-tête} 20:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It should be showing Motoblur GB. About that CM7, the wallpaper is a custom one of a person's house, plus the battery percentage is shown, which isn't stock. I would know what stock CM7 looks like, being a user of it until I switched to CM9.

Actually, it's just the garage, pic taken from the house. I'm running Jokersax's CM9 now as well. that battery percentage thing is a pretty minor difference, but do you have a pic of the atrix with it's stock MotoGB? -- Despayre ^{tête-à-tête} 03:23, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the picture with one of my Atrix running Bell Motoblur 2.3.6. --Mather1 (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Leaked" ICS on XDA

There is a "leaked" ICS ROM for Atrix on xda-developers: XDA -- Liam Spradlin (10-10-2012). "Motorola Atrix 4G Gets Leaked Ice Cream Sandwich Build – Here's How To Install It". Android Police. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) `a5b (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SIM card

The phone uses a SIM card. Should this be mentioned ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 23:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty redundant to state that a mobile phone takes a SIM card. But it could be useful to note the size (mini). --Imroy (talk) 02:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. But my (limited) understanding is that, for example, Cricket Wireless does not deal with phones with a SIM card. So i suppose that there are two kinds here: those with a removable card, where you can possibly switch carrier (provided that you also unlock the device), and the others, where i don't know how you would. Hence my question in the first place. --Jerome Potts (talk) 21:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Display

I changed "qHD" (which means Quad HD with 1440x2560 resolution) to "quarter-HD" to clarify that the Atrix 4G has a 540x960 resolution. Also, I changed the text to clarify that it wasn't the first Pentile display, but the first quarter-HD Pentile display. The first phone with a Pentile display was the Google/HTC Nexus One released on 2010-01-05 with a 480x800 AMOLED display. --Amosbatto (talk) 13:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Motorola Atrix 4G. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]