Talk:Mucky Pup

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comics: Strips Start‑class Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic strips work group.

Biohazard

If their work/association with Biohazard was important why is it not (i.e. it ought to be) mentioned in their article too? --kingboyk 05:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can only speak for the article that I, personally, wrote. I felt it was significant in Mucky Pup's history and therefor, added it. The person who initially wrote Biohazard's info, either felt differently or was just unaware there was such a collaboration. I'll check out the Biohazard entry and see if I can find a place to insert the info.JohnBWatt

Good stuff, cheers. --kingboyk 07:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Your interest in the inclusion, led me to completely rewriting the Biohazard article, who I was also pretty familiar with.--JohnBWatt 03:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I can see you put a lot of time and effort it. I think I saw Biohazard once or twice at festivals in the early 90s, but you know how memories fade from eras such as that :-)

I have a question re Mucky Pup. These are the guys who did the song "The Skinheads Broke My Walkman", is that correct? If so, where can I get it? Also, do you know who they toured with in the UK in the early 90s? I'm pretty sure I've seen them, and I have an idea it was as support to Carter USM. Would that be right? --kingboyk 23:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your other question, about "The Skinheads Broke My Walkman," are you looking for the song or the entire album? If you need just the song, I can send it to you. The album it's on, is Act Of Faith and can be usually be found on the European E-Bay and Amazon sites, pretty cheap. --JohnBWatt

OK, I'll take a look see if I can buy myself a copy, thanks. --kingboyk 00:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

This article survived a discussion at Articles for deletion. The result was Speedy keep. -ikkyu2 (talk) 10:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The heart symbol on U Stink

I've changed the heart symbol because while the it does appear in the song title on the flexi-disc, the song is U Stink But I LOVE You and that is how it appears on the album. Secondly, some computers do not have the font that displays the font properly. I know for a fact because one of my older computers displays it as a box instead.

I'll humbly disagree here. The published title of the song is "U-Stink-But-I-♥-U" (as printed in the book and on the disc), and should be listed as such on this page, as it is on the Billy and the Boingers page. I've just checked this page on two Macs and two PCs (one XP, one Win98) and it displays just fine. TheRealFennShysa 17:04, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does NOT show on my Windows ME computer. I know that for a fact. JohnBWatt

I'm sorry, but that doesn't change the fact that the verifiable published title of the song is "U-Stink-But-I-♥-U", which is what the article should reflect. TheRealFennShysa 17:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm holding the disc in my hands now. If we're going to go by the logic of what's printed on the disc, then we can both seen as wrong. While the disc has the heart, the artwork simply lists the song as "U-Stink." Not looking for an argument but my point in the whole matter is why list in a way where people may not understand it, when the word itself is always going to show up? JohnBWatt

Does the "U-Stink-But-I-♥-U" (done by HTML code) work any better? TheRealFennShysa 17:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't know right now because that computer is at another house. I was at that house editing the article when I noticed it one time. JohnBWatt

Stories

I know it's tough, especially for a band like this where info is hard to come by, but I remember this band having a lot personality (and having some pretty funny stories regarding some, perhaps all, of their members that came and went). This article isn't bad, and it's great that bands like this are getting there due on wikipedia, but its kind of dry. I think it needs a lot more regarding the personality of the band (because there was A LOT of it). I realize this is easier said than done. I'll even concede, personally, I wouldn't know where or even how to start.

I know a bunch of the band members personally and while I could have added those kinds of stories to the article, I don't think funny anecdotes are appropriate for the Wikipedia entry. Their own website is the place for that kind of stuff while this should be left for information and history. JohnBWatt 21:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckyact.jpg

Image:Muckyact.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckyalive.jpg

Image:Muckyalive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckybooth.jpg

Image:Muckybooth.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckyboy.jpg

Image:Muckyboy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckycant.jpg

Image:Muckycant.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckyfive.jpg

Image:Muckyfive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckylemon.jpg

Image:Muckylemon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Muckynow.jpg

Image:Muckynow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

This article has been tagged since 2010 as lacking references, to reflect verifiability, since 2010, challenging the unreferenced material. If anyone wishes to address that, please do so now, before the material is deleted. Focus on those sentences that lack RS references, or any references at all. --Epeefleche (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mucky Pup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140112050606/http://stepoutmag.squarespace.com/home/2012/2/9/hot-dog.html to http://stepoutmag.squarespace.com/home/2012/2/9/hot-dog.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:12, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Milnes

This is my first Wikipedia talk I've been on so I apologise in advance if I sound naive. I am a Mucky Pup fan from when i bought their first vinyl when I was about 16. I have only just started listening to them again on Spotify after about 30 years (sold my record player, arghhh) Anyway to cut a potentionally very long story shortish I would like to know if anyone knows which songs Predator covered? If this is controlled by a bot I'm going to scream lol

Thanks heaps, Lisa Gill 180.216.56.104 (talk) 06:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]