Talk:Mundari language

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Mundari-English Dictionary By Manindra Bhusan Bhaduri

http://books.google.com/books?id=WmTHmL8ymy0C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 04:56, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mundari language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928030710/http://www.southasiabibliography.de/Bibliography/Austroasiatic/Munda/Mundari/mundari.html to http://www.southasiabibliography.de/Bibliography/Austroasiatic/Munda/Mundari/mundari.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect examples.

Is अम कोते ते हिजु ताना ? a correct example? It appears twice with different transliteration. And none of the transliteratios seems to match the devanagari text. ~~ Zalmoksis (talk) 20:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About recent reverts

This is a message for @John B123: for the recent reverts here and here. There were (and are now) two articles that are clubbed as one: one about the language and the other about the writing system. There is no need for such a peculiar design. Secondly, my edits also contains copyedits and non-standard format that existed before. John B123, can I ask what was wrong with my edits? I should have discussed about splitting the article nevertheless, but reverting legitimate edits does not make any sense. --Psubhashish (talk) 17:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Psubhashish: As you say, you should have followed WP:SPLIT and gained consensus for the move. It would help other editors if you didn't add misleading edit summaries, such as here when you split off the content, yet used the edit summary "copyedited". --John B123 (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John B123:, thanks for the quick response. Starting a discussion on that. --Psubhashish (talk) 18:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting proposal

I propose that section "Mundari language#Mundari Bani" be split into a separate page called Mundari Bani Hisir. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. In fact, the section at present is written just like an article. There should be information about a writing system inside the article but it should not include the details it currently contains. Psubhashish (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, there is a Draft:Mundari Bani about the writing system. I cannot estimate when it can be moved into article. Anyway, from that draft's references (eg the well-researched Unicode proposal) I can claim that the title should be "Mundari Bani" (=content article page then). -DePiep (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @DePiep: for sharing. I have incorporated what I included in the article. I don't think there is any conflict between the name as both are indeed native names that are in popular use. --Psubhashish (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mundari Bani has two sources (at least) that name the script "Mundari Bani" (without 'Hisir' then). For this, we should accept that Mundari Bani is the primary name. This also implies that the content article should be Mundari Bani (draft into article). -DePiep (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the Draft into article Mundari Bani. -DePiep (talk) 18:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much, @DePiep:. This is a good news indeed. I wasn't hoping this process to be this fast. :-) --Psubhashish (talk) 02:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]