Talk:Murray Hydroelectric Power Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of [[Category:Environment]] on the article page.

  • If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
  • If you disagree with this assessment, please:
  1. Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
  2. Remove the stub template from the article.

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Murray-2 Hydroelectric Power Station be merged into Murray-1 Hydroelectric Power Station. I think that the content in the Murray 2 article can easily be explained in the context of Murray 1 article by adding a separate section, and the Murray 1 article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Murray 2 will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. The precedent for the proposed merger is already established for the three power stations at Tumut. Rangasyd (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Tumut article looks a bit cluttered with two infoboxes down the side, and it really should have a third (for Tumut 1). Other than that I don't have any major objections to the merge. With the resources I have at hand I would only be able to expand the detail on each power station to a couple of paragraphs - not really ehnough to justify separate articles. Wongm (talk) 12:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Tumut fixed to look much less cluttered. Rangasyd (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I support the proposal, particularly given the current size of each article.--NortyNort (Holla) 15:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Merge complete.--NortyNort (Holla) 15:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. This one slipped off my radar. Rangasyd (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murray Hydroelectric Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)