This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
A fact from Musée Archéologique de Dijon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 May 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Creating the page per request on WP:RA/AA, as it is linked to in the page for Claus Sluter as well as the articles for several Burgundian archaeological finds, including the article for Sequana. However, despite drawing much information from the French page on the subject, that page includes no citations. I've done my best to translate the information over (I have not brought over any photographs of the collections yet), but more sources than the NYT one I added will be needed to verify claims, especially regarding the history of its founding. Many sources will probably be in French. Deku link (talk) 09:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. No QPQ is needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Deku link: A very important point! The article seems to be at least in part a translation of the French Wikipedia article. To conform with Wikipedia's copyright obligations, you should declare this on the talk page (I have done this in this instance), and mention it in the edit summary where the translation was done - something like "Translating from the French Wikipedia article" is sufficient. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Cwmhiraeth: Thank you for doing so! I wasn't aware that needed to be done and I will keep it in mind for future translations (although a good amount of it is paraphrased to accommodate sources I had to find, since the French article lists none! Furthermore, if the first or second hook needs to be longer, it could be clarified that the offerings are ex votos thrown into the Seine and that the abbey is specifically the Abbey of St. Bénigne.