Talk:Nakajima C6N

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:16, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Propeller. The Specifications section of the article is titled "Specifications (C6N1)". This makes perfect sense, as the N1 variant was also the "General production model", as can be seen in the "Variants" section of the article. The "Variants" section also correctly shows that all C6N1, except the earliest prototypes, were fitted with three-blade propeller. The "Variants" section of the article is sourced properly. Ample of photographs also shows the serial production airplanes fitted with three-bladed propeller. The few photos of four-bladed propeller C6N are the early prototypes, easily recognizable because of (the four bladed propeller of course, and) the large air scoop on the bottom port side quarter of the cowling (noticeably smaller air scoop for the serial production C6N1). My edit has been reverted as unexplained, unsourced change to cited content, although it's been in accordance with the properly sourced information in other section of the article. I am not exactly sure about the propeller being "metal" and "constant-speed", as many mid to late WW2 high performance designs used wooden-bladed propellers (Ju 88, Fw 190, Spitfire to name a few). And a variable pitch propeller does not automatically mean constant-speed propeller. Hence my removal of "metal", "constant-speed" propeller attributes from the article, as these seem to be unsourced. If my second attempt to edit the specifications will be reverted again, I will not try any more to correct the specifications to not be accused of vandalism. NotedCollector (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit for typos and I also misplaced the air scoop for the prototypes, the current photo on top of the page confused me well, because it is flipped horizontally. Correct higher-resolution variants of the same photo are available. The air scoops on the bottom port side quarter of the cowling differed significantly in size, but not in the placement, as the flipped photo in the article would suggest. NotedCollector (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]