Talk:Nakhon Ratchasima province
![]() | This article contains content created by the Tourism Authority of Thailand. This content has been added by User:Borndistinction with the consent of the TAT and has been released (like other Wikipedia content) under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License Version 1.2 and later. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Administrative divisions
[edit]While that table is really nice, I worry it may be too much for include it into this article. I would suggest to create a separate article Districts of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, in which that table would fit better, and then could also add a description on the changes of the districts, kind of a textual description of what is listed in the "Establish" column. Then the section in this article could be changed back into the simple list of districts with the map, and just state the number of the further divisions. The local administration units (TAO and Thesaban) also belong into this section, and as Nakhon Ratchasima is the province with the most of municipalities right now any such table would really be way to lengthy for an overview article. I am not sure if the district and the municipalities should be put into the same sub-article, or a separate Municipalities in Nakhon Ratchasima Province would be better.
Apart from that suggestion - I would love to know what is the "class" in that district table. I haven't heard of a district class so far, the only entity which has "classes" to my knowledge are the TAO. Can someone please explain me what this class is, or point me to a outside source for it. Especially - where to find the district classes for the other provinces. andy (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Sources modified on Nakhon Ratchasima Province
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just attempted to maintain the sources on Nakhon Ratchasima Province. I managed to add archive links to 1 source, out of the total 1 I modified, whiling tagging 0 as dead.
Please take a moment to review my changes to verify that the change is accurate and correct. If it isn't, please modify it accordingly and if necessary tag that source with {{cbignore}}
to keep Cyberbot from modifying it any further. Alternatively, you can also add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page's sources altogether. Let other users know that you have reviewed my edit by leaving a comment on this post.
Below, I have included a list of modifications I've made:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150103070900/http://www.thailex.info/THAILEX/THAILEXENG/LEXICON/Copy%20of%20Nakhon%20Ratchasima.htm to http://www.thailex.info/THAILEX/THAILEXENG/LEXICON/Copy%20of%20Nakhon%20Ratchasima.htm
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nakhon Ratchasima Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210183943/http://www.tourismthailand.org/destinationguide/list.aspx?provinceid=19 to http://www.tourismthailand.org/destinationguide/list.aspx?provinceid=19
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 11 February 2018 (UTC)