Talk:Narsinh Mehta

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

India: Gujarat Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as High-importance).

Hinduism: Krishnaism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up: biography and poetic works

Hi, I have consolidated, cleaned up, and cited the biography and poetic works section of this article. The previous approach contained multiple "biography" sections biographical events, with some sections being a heavy synopsis of a single reference vs other areas not being referenced at all

Most importantly, I've consolidated two biography sections into one cohesive section that includes both the "study of biography" as well as biographical events based on available literature. Have tried my best to preserve the original content where it made sense, but I've inserted it into the relevant areas to help the overall biography flow. I've also added structure where appropriate to reflect other wiki pages of notable poets/writers. Lastly there I've added content to more closely reflect the the available references and pivotal moments that defined his legacy. Please let me know if any questions or other suggestions on the approach. Note: formatting consistencies (i.e., italicizing appropriate words) are still a WIP. Schwinnspeed (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for copyediting it. I have done some minor cleanup as well. Please ask me if you have any questions. Regards, Nizil (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Veracity of the letter

File:Narsih Mehta Letter111.jpg

Letter by Narsinh Mehta on death of his mother

SKAG123, the image of letter on left was recently added to the article. I believe it that it is a fake letter judging from the alphabets, style, use of years and other things like brackets, surname (Vastraj Oza). Many of these writing features were late addition to Gujarati language and 15th century Gujarati was completely different. So this image is removed. Please give your opinion.- Nizil (talk) 06:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gazal world Please give your opinion as you have worked extensively on Gujarati writers too.- Nizil (talk) 06:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the image is unsourced. SKAG123 (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This letter doesn't seems real. Scholars on Narsinh Mehta like Shivlal Jesalpura, Jethalal Trivedi, K. M. Mushi, K. K. Shastri, Jayant Kothari, Darshana Dholakia, Françoise Mallison and others have never mentioned this letter. We can only use this letter when it is referenced in a scholarly research. We should also nominate it for deletion under 'Commons:Out of scope', so that people don't get misinformation. --Gazal world (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]