Talk:Nazarene (sect)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nazarene beliefs[edit]

Under this section, it sounds as this is factual, but actually, this was St. Jerome's opinion, who was Catholic. I would not call that factual, as I am sure there were other opinions of that time, especially those of the Nazarene, that would contradict Jerome. It would be better to say Nazarene beliefs according to St. Jerome. Also, this section is somewhat contradicted, when one reads about the Nazarenes under the page on the Essenes, and their description of the Nazarene sect.--Craxd (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Right, there is something fishy here. I believe it is about most editors not wanting Christianity to have emerged from some teaching which was early on rejected as a heresy. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 22:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Proto-Nazarenes?[edit]

Would the group described beginning at Acts 4:32 be considered Proto-Nazarenes? Virgil H. Soule (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry but this is not a discussion forum. Your question is interesting, but the talk pages should be about the article text, it's content, and the text should be sourced with "secondary sources", i.e. experts who say this or that to support the article text. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 13:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nazoreans[edit]

I'm interested in Nazoreans, why then am I redirected to the (irrelevant) Nazarene page? I propose splitting "The Nazarenes (4th century)" into another article. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 06:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

  • User:Rursus please don't do that. What exactly is the difference between Nazoreans and Nazarenes? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Panarion 18. Epiphanius Against the Nasaraeans
Panarion 29. Epiphanius Against the Nazoraeans
Nasoraean -> Nazarene (sect)
Nasoraeans -> Mandaeism
The stupid redirections makes it impossible to distinguish between historical sects and modern religions. There was a 1st century sect "Nazoraeans" and a 4th century sect "Nazoraeans". Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 20:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nazarene (sect). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)