Talk:Netlify
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Netlify article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 21 April 2021. |
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Comment: The Netlify-related files that were unilaterally and erroneously reported as cross-wiki spam have been reinstated by a Commons admin at my request. Edelsheim (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Should Jamstack get its own article?
[edit]Tonight I was suggesting to someone that if they wanted to get started with building a website with JavaScript, they should check out the "Jamstack" way of developing sites. I naturally looked here in Wikipedia and was surprised to find only a redirect to the Netlify page with just a paragraph about "Jamstack". While developers at Netlify came up with the term "Jamstack" and started using it, the term is now widely used within the web development world. jamstack.org lists the many site generators and headless CMS's that support "jamstack" development. There are numerous articles in reliable sources, and multiple books now available. It feels to me like there should be a separate article specifically about Jamstack. Thoughts? Opinions? - Dyork (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- No, it shouldn't get its own article because it is purely a Netlify marketing term.
- There is a website called "jamstack.org", but despite its top-level domain being ".org", it appears to be a Netlify website. I get the impression (which could of course be wrong) that some deception is intended here, insofar as ".org" normally suggests a non-commercial site and jamstack.org appears to be a Netlify marketing site. Longitude2 (talk) 07:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleting material with non-reliable source
[edit]The section "Reception" quotes from a Netlify press release. A press release does not qualify as a reliable source. I'm going to delete the quote. Longitude2 (talk) 10:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Trading binary
[edit]Binary Trading Quotex 95 %accurcy 182.186.252.143 (talk) 09:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Mid-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance
- All Websites articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles