This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
First off, I should declare COI as a member of the group and as someone who knows some of the creators in real life. That being said, I think this article is too heavily steeped in discussing the ideas/actions of the groups founders and moderators, and not enough on the subject itself. Proper adjustments might include removing referential statements like "Juliet Eldred said...." and so on. I think it focuses too much on things that are not part of the notability of the group. Just my $0.02. I think it's entirely justified in the History subsection, but elsewhere it seems gratuitous. If no one objects, I'm gonna start a mild cleanup. --Shibbolethink(♔♕)17:07, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N: Notability is determined by the number of third-party sources writing about the topic. This article has plenty of independent news coverage, making it worthwhile here. "Not seeming remarkable" is not a criterion for deletion. ɱ(talk)19:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
