Talk:Nisaba

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nisaba article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq Low‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

unexplained references

At the bottom of this page there is a link to another deity from another culture and time period. You'd think they would be related with each other, by origin or regarding their theme. But it's never clear why there is such a link in the first place, as "Nidaba" is not referred to again in the article about Sarasvati.

My question is: Are those links simply sort-of-associative? So if a deity shares similar aspects with another it deserves a link, or is there some theory of origin or something here that I missed? These unexplained links confuse me. Thanks. 84.129.159.22 (talk)

You are right, without context these two links are very confusing. They are both gods from different belief systems that have something to do with "writing". According to the Wikpedia manual of style: A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in the body of a hypothetical "perfect article" are suitable to add to the "See also" appendix of a less developed one. Whether these two should be in the article is debatable, the connection is quite superficial. Enki H. (talk) 06:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nidaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230152532/http://www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/section1/tr122.htm to http://www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/section1/tr122.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nidaba vs. Nisaba

At present, the article is titled "Nidaba" with Nisaba given as an alternate reading of the cuneiform sign NAGA in the goddess' name. However, almost every source I've found uses Nisaba. A Google Scholar search for "Nidaba Sumerian" gives around 300 results, while a search for "Nisaba Sumerian" gives over 1,000 results. Restricting this search to the past 5 years only, the difference is an order of magnitude (~20 vs. ~200). (Apparently there is an Assyriology researcher named Nisaba, so I tried to exclude citations from the search, but this might not work perfectly if they are mentioned in the text). It seems that Nisaba is in prevailing use. Should the name of this article change, or is there a compelling recent source arguing that Nidaba is actually correct? Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dinoguy2: Nisaba appears to be, by far, the more common spelling of her name. The book Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary by Jeremy Black and Anthony Green, which was one of the main sources I used while I was writing the article "List of Mesopotamian deities," only calls her "Nisaba." The names of ancient Mesopotamian deities do generally tend to have a lot of different spellings, though, so my guess is that the person who originally created this article probably just happened to have one of the few sources that call her "Nidaba" and so that is what they decided to call the article. I would say it would be a good idea to move this article from "Nidaba" to "Nisaba." —Katolophyromai (talk) 07:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consort

Must be my week for god questions. The excavators of Tell Harmal, in Sumer [1], said that the consort of Nisaba was a Khani. If that is out of date knowledge I'll fix the Shaduppum article.Ploversegg (talk) 22:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a vintage reading that has since been updated, and the Tell Harmal deity in mention is simply Haya (there should be a breve under the h), I think there's a direct statement to that effect in one of the Weeden articles listed in that wiki entry. I will double check when I am home in about 9-10 hours. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 05:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I followed your bread crumbs to Haya and saw "The reading Hani is no longer considered to be correct." which in retrospect means that I should have been smart enough to find my way there via the Nisaba article and figure this out myself, which is embarrassing. I'll try to think more before I ask next time. Of course in the process of freshening Shaduppum I noticed that the next door site article I wrote claimed that Tell al-Dhiba'i has a god named Lamisu/Lammisu who is a version of Kash/Kesh according to the excavators etc (example - [2]). I's see if I can figure out who that really is. Thanks for the assistance.Ploversegg (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]