Talk:No Future for You

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Buffyverse task force.

Comics: United States Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Lady Genevieve Savidge??

Who is she, I'm interested if she's real. Has she been confirmed to be in the arc...>If so the cite where you got it.---User:Smartjoe299

I've certainly never heard of her, which isn't to say it's inaccurate, I suppose. Jeff-El 16:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I found a solicitation and referenced it accordingly. Jeff-El 16:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dialect error

Giles sends Faith to a "fancy dress party" which in England means a costume party. For Faith her formal gown is a costume, but ... —Tamfang 21:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Faith and faith compare.jpg

Image:Faith and faith compare.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NoFutureCover.jpg

Image:NoFutureCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and artwork

Are there any sources for the statements that writing and artwork refer to specific aspects of pop culture such as the Sex Pistols, Alan Moore or Escape from New York? I suspect whoever put these in is correct, but that doesn't mean it should go in without verification. Hobson 00:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary

It's far too indepth. What we have here breaks guidelines. It needs condensing. A lot. ~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 20:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, remember this article concerns 4 seperate comic issues (1,2,3,4). - Don't have an account to sign in with. Ryan1711 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.186.123 (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar in the Summaries

The way the sentences are strung together is unimpressive and very run-on. This creates a very jagged picture for our readers. I move for a complete rewrite... I will give whomever wrote the summary 72 hours to correct the mistakes, but if it is not done, I myself will personally rectify this to be more eloquent. Domestibot (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Domestibot[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on No Future for You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071013133042/http://stakesandsalvation.com:80/2007/05/interview-with-scott-allie.html to http://www.stakesandsalvation.com/2007/05/interview-with-scott-allie.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No Future for You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723005827/http://www.slayerlit.us/interviews/interview6.htm to http://www.slayerlit.us/interviews/interview6.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]