Talk:Nothin Personal

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2016. The result of the discussion was Snow Keep.

Requested move 25 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Requests for reverting page moves are done at WP:RMT. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothin Personal (Cozz album) → Nothin Personal – In ictu oculi moved this page without any discussion - and it's not the first time (see I Loved You for example). There's nothing else called Nothin Personal and I'm pretty sure someone who intentionally leaves out the 'g' isn't just doing it for the hell of it. Unreal7 (talk) 20:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:MOVE. We have other topics without g on Nothing_Personal#Music so RM isn't correct. More to the point, what is notable about this mixtape? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Calidum ¤ 02:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 29 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. The SMALLDETAILS debate rages on with no end in sight and as usual the vote is split with reasonable arguments from both sies. AfD might kill two birds with one stone here. Jenks24 (talk) 15:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothin Personal → Nothin Personal (Cozz album) – This proposed move was performed, then reverted as controversial, so here is the "official" move request. I support it too because ... I do not believe that the first word missing a "g" or an apostrophe is enough to distinguish itself from other subjects listed at the disambiguation page Nothing Personal, especially when dropping the "g" in most slang uses of the word "nothing" is quite common with the use of an apostrophe after the "n" afterwords maybe or maybe not happening. Also, the "(Cozz album)" disambiguation would be needed since other albums are already listed on the disambiguation page. (After the move, the title Nothin Personal would then be redirected to Nothing Personal.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging In ictu oculi, Unreal7 and Calidum since they participated in the previous discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete how does this mixtape pass WP:NALBUMS? Unlike the 1998 single "Nothin' Personal" this hasn't charted. But if it stays, then Support, since the ' isn't unique to this album, and even if it were it still wouldn't be enough to differ from Nothing Personal. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @In ictu oculi: This sounds more like an argument in an AfD than an RM. 96.41.0.15 (talk) 23:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, consensus that WP:SMALLDETAILS is sufficient for disambiguation has been established in numerous previous RMs. SST flyer 01:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't true. More importantly articles don't show it. And recent edits to WP:SMALLDETAILS misrepresent the article corpus. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support, consensus that WP:SMALLDETAILS is insufficient for disambiguation has been established in numerous previous RMs. Dicklyon (talk) 04:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SMALLDETAILS. I don't see any other topics that are called "Nothin Personal" with no G. A hate note to Nothing Personal should suffice. I'm also unaware of any consensus that there's a consensus that the long-standing policy on SMALLDETAILS has changed; at any rate it hasn't changed the policy's wording that small spelling differences are "usually sufficient to distinguish topics". At any rate, this detail isn't terribly "small", it's a different spelling than any other article.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Unreal7 (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.