Jump to content

Talk:Nuclear Waste Policy Act

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Added material on NWPA requirements for nuclear waste repositories, with sources. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this article does a great job at illustrating the yucca mountain permanent repository. https://www.energy.gov/downloads/nuclear-waste-policy-act — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesotelo1218 (talkcontribs) 22:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lesotelo1218 (article contribs).

Current status and lede?

[edit]

Are there sources that discuss the current status?

I haven't read every word, but what I've read suggests to me that the process is currently stalled:

  • The US Congress amended the act in 1987 to designate Yucca Mountain.
  • Nevada vetoed it in April 2002 but Congress overrode the veto in July 2002.
  • Nevada appealed and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Nevada in 2004.
  • At least one other jurisdiction filed suit to force Yucca Mountain to take their waste, including Aiken County, SC in 2011.

I think the lede should be dramatically rewritten, shortened to a summary like this. However, I believe others should know much more than I do about this. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewrote the lede consistent with this summary. Please modify this further in any way you think will make the article better ... but please keep the lede concise, containing the primary points -- including especially the current status. If the current status is different from this summary, I want to know. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]