Talk:OnePath Network

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal OnePath Network is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

عليّ سعيد (talk · contribs) has been paid by OnePath Network on behalf of Rami Alcheikh. Disclosed here

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

COI

Just noting that I've tagged this as needing checking as it was created using text provided by the subject as part of a paid editing job. I think that the topic is notable, but the COI means that it warrants checking for neutrality and to remove the promotional tone. - Bilby (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid Contribution

{{connected contributor (paid)}}

disclosure
`{{Connected contributor (paid)\|User1=عليّ سعيد\|U1-employer=OnePath Network\|U1-client=Rami Alcheikh\|U1-otherlinks=[1]}}`

عليّ سعيد (talk) 14:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove Neutral point of view and Advertising boxes on the submission

Hi, Jytdog

I don't know if I'm rightful do this or not, sorry for any disturbance.

I've polished the article, there's no promotional content, no grammar mistakes, no dead links, no false or inaccurate information, and it's not biased. As you can see, it's a thin article for a newly recognized media network.

It's written in compliance with Wikipedia's guideline. Also, I've disclosed my paid contribution here, on my own user page and through edits summary of the article. And I will not do any further contribution to this particular article under any circumstances. عليّ سعيد (talk) 16:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your evaluation of your work is not accurate. There is still unsourced content and the quotes about how great it is, are blatant selling. This is not a little ambiguous. It is still an advert and of course is the product of conflicted editing. If you would have put this through AfC as you should have, reviewers there would have helped you with those things. Jytdog (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe every information or statement is sourced on the article. For these two quotes, I thought it would help readers to realize the media identity, I searched for other opinions but I didn't find. Anyway I will delete them as long as there is no wide-range of reviews. I don't recognize any other promotional tone. عليّ سعيد (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am fixing it, since the tag has been stripped and the article left in a poor state. Jytdog (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could have waited while I made my edits, but so be it. - Bilby (talk) 01:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

OnePath Network.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]