Talk:Paddy McGuinness (civil servant)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Paddy McGuinness (intelligence officer))
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move 8 January 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 04:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Paddy McGuinness (intelligence officer) → Paddy McGuinness (civil servant) – Intelligence officer claim unsubstantiated Incumbentpanda (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). JudgeMR (talk to me) 00:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- This is most certainly to be controversial; as such, I have begun an RM on this. I'll comment on this further later. JudgeMR (talk to me) 00:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. The correct title for this move would be Paddy McGuinness (civil servant), not capitalized. @Incumbentpanda: May I adjust your proposal accordingly? —C.Fred (talk) 00:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- @C.Fred: feel free to. Incumbentpanda (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Done. —C.Fred (talk) 01:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Whether he has been an intelligence officer or not, he's definitely been (and is) a civil servant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.