Talk:Padma River

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


if jamuna(brahmaputra) is the larger river then ganges why does it lose its name to the former and is referred as padma and meghna?

Historic reasons. Jamuna used to be a small river branch of Brahmaputra. However, in the Assam valley earthquake of 1897, the course of the Brahmaputra changed, and Jamuna became the larger branch. --Ragib 12:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For record: --Bhadani 15:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


[The Padma's] maximum depth is 1,571 feet (479 m) and average depth is 968 feet (295 m).

This seems wildly unlikely for a river running through an alluvial plain. The sentence has been around for a while though; added in 2009 by Maybe these numbers refer to some other characteristic of the river?
—WWoods (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that is quite ridiculous. That IP address made a similar mess on many pages; I wonder how we can clear it all out. This document has some decent information, including the statement "maximum depths at certain points in time and space can be 40 m or more". Sminthopsis84 (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I added conversion templates, then noticed the absurd claims, then deleted the claims before thinking to look at the talk page. Perhaps I can help in some way to improve the article, but I'll have to hunt for reliable sources. I don't know what success I'll have. I have access to JSTOR, which includes quite a few science journals, some of which publish articles about rivers and watersheds. Finetooth (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)