Talk:Palakollu

India: Andhra Pradesh / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Requested move 14 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: evidence presented in discussion indicates the present article title is the common name. DrKay (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palakollu → Palacole – Newspapers and other official sites uses the name as Palacole, [1], [2],[3], [4], [5] --Relisted. Sunrise (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC) Vin09 (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The proposal needs more evidence than a few websites. For contrary evidence, searches for news sources only favour Palakollu (Palakollu 130 hits vs Palacole 59 hits). A basic Google book search would support the move (2170 to 1920), but this is probably due to old publications and Google ngrams show that Palacole is little used in modern publications. Searches with disambiguations, e.g. for "Palakollu, Andhra Pradesh" vs "Palacole, Andhra Pradesh" (including the quotes) suggest that the Palakollu is more common in wider use. Imc (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Palakollu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Palakollu, Palacole, Palakol

@Imc: names like Palacole/Palakollu/Palaokol are mentioned on its official municipality website, with Palacole being used more than once and even census at [6] shows it as Palacole. Can you please check these sites [7]. --IM3847 (talk) 10:38, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Palakollu is a "town", Not city

Census of India officially classifies "Palacole" as Class II (Town), Palakollu also does not feature in the "Cities having population 1 lakh and above, Census 2011"

I edited it as a town in the introduction and settlement type. But in the article, the term city is used liberally (read Palakollu City) in several occasions. Please cite any WP:RS before reverting my edit. Ab207 (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POV issues

The editor Deesalamma has left me no potion but to open a POV discussion. Refusing to engage in any meaningful debate on talk page and hell bent on calling this human settlement a city. Except for a few local newspapers, we are yet to see any official data that confirms the same. Without which calling this human geographic settlement a city is simply POV pushing which violates WP:NPOV.--Ab207 (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]