Talk:Past

Time Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Mid‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by IncompleteBits (talk · contribs) on 6 November 2021 with the comment:
This article is redundant with Grammatical tense, many of the articles linked to in the fields of study section (most notably Memory), and should be redundant with (but does not mention the scientific uncertainty about the existence of the past which results from uncertainty about the) Arrow of time.
It was contested by RunningTiger123 (talk · contribs) on 2021-11-06 with the comment:
The "past" is a notable topic, so deleting it wholesale is probably not the right move. At the very least, an AfD would allow more thorough consideration of alternatives, such as redirects and merges.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 6 September 2021 for a period of one week.

What is the difference between future and past?

Is the only difference between future and past is that we can remember past, but cannot remember future? 93.178.119.100 (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment

Has a lot of bells and whistles, but still a Stub in terms of content.

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 19:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC) drunk. want . more. past lives better ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.191.241.246 (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC) The past never proceeds yet u can go ahead skake it dont break iT do u remember how u got here[reply]

Anonymous — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.137.78.1 (talk) 05:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Hmmm. How do we know that the past exists? In reality, the past is just the present that is no more, so how can it be if it no longer is?

The past is just a construct in our minds. Hence it is always changing as we rebuild it with every new experience

The past does exist

The past is a mind category that we use and a thing that doesn't quite exist as a tangible thing but it exists nonetheless, it's just that humans are time constrained in the time continuum. And we don't change the past, we think we do, put what we change is our impression of the past. Not the past itself. --Rodrigo Cornejo 01:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The past is not only mind category, but also a physical one. What scientific source does deny the physical existence of the Past? гык 11:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Past?

Why don't we include the past-related things into their category?

The past is the object of such fields as history, archaeology, archaeoastronomy, historical linguistics, geology (historical geology), paleontology, paleobotany, paleoethnobotany, palaeogeography, paleoclimatology, cosmology

– or rather, their categories should be included, if they exist.

Also: memory, retro, antiquarian, fossil, history.

Adam78 00:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it alright to call past the "opposite of future"? 59.184.252.69 (talk) 18:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New "light cone" image

We have prepared a new "light cone" image. The intention was to imply the correct scale of space-time relative to the observer. Interstellar light-years vs years scales seemed appropriate. If you have any comments please post them at the Graphics Lab entry. Dhatfield (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

memories

The memories of j.k.rowling is what she left and did not include her past but only memories i think she should have so we can remember her for rememberance also so we can change the better and have the better in projects about her —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.158.6.106 (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Memory as a field of study

The article says that the past is an important topic of study in fields such as..and then includes "memory" in the list. I was unaware memory is a field of study (the psychology of memory is). Vorbee (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]