Talk:Patricia Rodríguez (model)

race/ethnicity

What's her ethnicity/race? I remember reading a comment on youtube that she looked like a Mexican which is quite possible noting that canary does get immigrants from Latin-America and those Amerindian genes they have can contribute to her dark "look" I don't think she looks like the indigenous Spaniards but unless other wise noted she's just indigenous canarian not from a foreign family member(s). Or those her dark looks come from the Guache i have no idea how guaches suppose to look like or berber In my opinion she looks like a Berber looking at that girl from the berber page. Is she consider to be part of the White/European race? If not then what?

HUMAN ? maybe--210.159.191.50 (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Um, there are millions of Spaniards with Patricia's skin complexion. Why are you and many people so obsessed with NOT calling any Europeans "brown skinned" as if it were a curse, unless you're a racist of course. You can also visit places like Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt and find people there who are lighter complected than Patricia, and other Spaniards. --108.0.215.194 (talk) 01:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

"brown skinned" is used for non-European people. Victoria Beckham is referred to as having olive complexion but I never heard people call her brown skinned. So I think there nothing wrong with OP assuming she is mixed, Spain DOES have a lot of immigrants from Morocco & Latin America, their children are born spanish but it doesn't mean they are ethnic spaniards. Anyways Spain's population identify 80% ethnic Spaniards while the remainding 20% are "other" according to wiki.--76.213.237.67 (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

"Personal Information" section

The post photo paragraphs and paragraphs listed in "Personal Information" are all incorrect information. Rodríguez, per her own words via her own verified social media pages, confirmed she is not queer identified and never has been. That was a rumor that was put out and she claims to have gone with it because she hoped it would help her career. She is and has always been heterosexual, Per her own words from her own social media. This article is not factual and doesn't cite correct sources. Please consider a subject's verified social media and what they post on them concerning themselves. That is how many people communicate with the masses these days. Gossip websites are not reliable sources of information and should not be considered as such Bondjamesbindjr (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

You are - and always have been - welcome to produce material to support your claims. Given what has transpired so far, you should reach consensus on the talk page before any further changes are made to the article with respect to your assertions. I will say that, despite your claim on my talk page, "E!" and "Cosmopolitan" would be considered reliable sources. In addition, if your claims about here recent behaviour are shown to be correct, her pretending the earlier reports are true for publicity purposes would probably be noteworthy in and of itself. Ckatz^talk 06:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Can the article be linked with her social media to confirm what was stated as of late ? Just because you consider E! And cosmopolitan reliable sources does not mean what is cited in this article is correct. When Rodríguez stated on her own sm pages that all of that was incorrect. No I was not allowed to cite my sources as I was told I could not use her own sm page and my corrections to the false information listed in this article are continuously taken down, I get warnings about being banned before I can get the only reliable source linked with correct information up in the first place. This article is factually incorrect and this website seems determined to keep it up without doing any research or allowing those who have to correct it. Bondjamesbindjr (talk) 06:50, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Those sources reference the statements about her actions in 2014 and her subsequent comment in 2021. If you have new information, discuss it and get consensus rather than simply making repeated unsourced changes. You have mentioned a supposed source from her social media, but you have not (to the best of my knowledge) produced a link at any point during your edits. If you have this link, please post it to the talk page so that it can be assessed. Ckatz^talk 07:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

The sources currently listed are incorrect. Her IG page is the source, she posted a statement on said page twice. Again, you said I could not reference her statements from her social media. Now you are saying I can? Which is it? Can social media accounts be used as sources? Gossip sites that post incorrect information seem to be able to be used. And who is this consensus? Are you determining that she said what she said on her own account or that it is her account? Bondjamesbindjr (talk) 07:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Cosmopolitan and E! are not considered "gossip" sites and they appear to be referencing something that, by your own admission, did happen in the past. You've also indicated that she chose to perpetuate the information for her own benefit, and then changed her story, which might be notable in itself in this day and age. Regardless, you've been asked to provide a link - any link - to what you claim is on her social media, bringing it here to the talk page so that others can examine it. Why have you not done so yet? Ckatz^talk 22:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Patricia Rodríguez Miss España Universo 2013 y quien entregará la corona a su sucesora..jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)