This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
It seem like the only thing notable about her is that people have made accusations against her. This does not make her important enough for a biographical article on WP, even if all the accusations are true. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Paula Casey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This article has poor grammar and style, and is not written in a disinterested, scholarly way. Instead, it reads like a poor attempt at a newspaper editorial. As a current student of Paula Casey's, I'm offended by the inaccuracies and clearly inflammatory language levelled against a professional. PLEASE EDIT THIS PAGE.
Last edited at 06:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 02:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I made some mostly compositional edits at this page, having come here because of a mention of her at the article on Jim McDougall. The writing at that article was pathetic and the numerous flags of the articles by other editors have not received adequate responses. I'm assuming that the same editor may have worked on this article. It is substantially below Wikipedia's standards. Activist (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
