Talk:Pemberton Regional Airport

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Canada: British Columbia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This refers to a version of the article that contained a copyright violation. CambridgeBayWeather (talk)

Contested deletion

--PemGateway (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)--PemGateway (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)--PemGateway (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --PemGateway (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

because in its current form it serves only to promote or publicise` an entity NOT TRUE , person NOT TRUE , product NOT TRUE , or idea NOT TRUE , and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic. However, the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is an article's subject does not, on its own, qualify that article for deletion under this criterion. Nor does this criterion apply where substantial encyclopedic content would remain after removing the promotional material; in this case please remove the promotional material yourself, or add the tag to alert others to do so. See CSD G11. THERE IS NO PROMOTIONAL MATERIEL. The airport is mostly unattended. To land in the winter you must contact the village to plow snow 1st hence contact info needed. To get fuel you must land during a limited set of times or phone ahead so a ph # is necessary.

as a copyright infringement of http://www.pemberton.ca/business/pemberton-regional-airport/flying-into-cyps-pemberton/ (Duplicate Detector report). This criterion applies only in unequivocal cases, where there is no free-content material on the page worth saving and no later edits requiring attribution – for more complicated situations, see Wikipedia:Copyright violations. See CSD G12. The Village of Pemberton, VoP runs the airport so it has the only web pages for the airport. This is public data on a public site, by a public entity do you wish a waiver from the VoP ??? do you wish quotes ??? Their staff have been thanking me & others entering local info online.

Please show me the courtesy of writing a response. Form Letters make you redundant as a person because a bot can do that much faster takes up less space & resources too. --PemGateway (talk) 01:06, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.