Talk:Philip Ruddock

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: New South Wales / Sydney / Politics Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Philip Ruddock is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Selective deletion

I am about to delete from the article history those revisions whose content and/or edit summaries libel Xtra, per Wikipedia's libel policy. Selective deletion requires full deletion followed by selective restoration. Therefore this article will be deleted for a very brief period of time. Snottygobble 02:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the problem with this is any honest discussion of this man will be automatically libelous and defamatory. He's one of real life's cartoon villains: He wore an Amnesty International lapel pin while presiding over an immigration regime which detained small children indefinitely (incareration for years in many cases) in primative privatised detention centres with 5 kilometre journalist exclusion zones. 203.59.80.62 17:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manga paragpraph

I have deleted the paragraph about Ruddock opposing the Ninja Scroll manga. It is of minor importance (unless you are a Ninja Star fan!) and does not rate such a detailed mention in this brief article, especially as it fell outside of Ruddock's area of ministerial responsibility. I do not even recall this being an issue at the time. Note that this paragraph was also unreferenced.--Iacobus (talk) 04:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes

The state of the article was brought to my attention. While I believe I have fixed the problems with it, mainly that it was almost in toto a violation of WP:UNDUE and the level of language was a bit simplistic for an encyclopaedic audience, it could do with substantially better biographical detail. I think the main thing here is to try and avoid the sort of partisan commentary about decisions taken as part of his role in Cabinet, which largely reflected the policy of the government of the day rather than any particular expression of views by Ruddock the person (who is after all the subject of this brief biography). Orderinchaos 03:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Service order

We were saying he’s the 3rd longest serving Member of the House of Reps (correct) and the 4th longest serving Parliamentarian (wrong) in the parliament’s history. Members of the Parliament of Australia who have served for at least 30 years tells us he’s still in 5th position overall, behind Hughes, Page, Pearce and Cooper. By my calculations, he’ll pass Cooper on 26 April and pass Pearce on Christmas Day. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 19:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I redid my figures. He passed Cooper on 7 May 2010 and is now the 4th longest serving parliamentarian. -- 202.142.129.66 (talk) 23:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

he said pkk is not terror org .he is right

HE SAYS pkk is not terror pls add thsi txt in wikipedia. yu can translate it -turkish-english here : http://www.firatnews.tv/index.php?rupel=nuce&nuceID=35543 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.184.104 (talk) 13:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]