Talk:Piers Anthony/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Kelvin of Rudd?

My friend was telling me he had another book called "Kelvin of Rudd" or something like that. But, I don't see it here.

Kelvin is the protagonist of the Dragon's Gold series Anthony wrote with Robert E. Margroff. The series is covered in the article.--Apascover 06:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Total Recall - Book and Movie

Hmm.. adding "Total Recall" to the list of non-series fiction - but unsure whether it is a novelization or not - the movie was released 1980 and book 1989 - best info I can find so far suggests the book was written based on the screenplay... but no confirmation of that yet. (maybe I'll have to email the author :))

The movie came out a few years after 1980. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.184.241.144 (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I have held Total Recall in my own two hands, and can vouch for it being a novelisation of the movie. —Paul A 02:35, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Just for the record, it's a novelisation of a movie based on a short story by Philip K. Dick.DS 00:06, 6 May 2004 (UTC)

I removed the comment and link to the Total Recall movie from the Total Recall book yesterday, because it was incorrect about the movie being based on the P. Anthony book. Then I read this discussion page, and added the link back in to reflect that the book is a novelization of the movie, which in turn is based on the short story/novella We Can Remember It For You Wholesale by Phillip K. Dick. Then I went searching for more information on what exactly is the progeny of this damn book, and found it (on Amazon.com, of all places!) - this is from a copyrighted blurb from Publishers Weekly so I am paraphrasing: The book was written before the release of the movie, and is a novelization of both the movie script and of the original P. K. Dick story. The first edition hardcover (ISBN 0688052096) was published Sept. 1 1989 by William Morrow & Co. The movie was released in 1990. Both the P. Anthony novel and the movie stick pretty close to the P.K. Dick story (except that the protagonist wasn't a big muscle-dude like Arnie is) until near the end, when it turns into a thriller/chase scene kind of story. Hopefully this ends the discussion! nihilism 19:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Pedophilia

I think the line in the intro paragraph about overtones of pedophilia should either be stricken or at least moved further down. I've never heard of such accusations, but that doesn't mean they haven't been made. At least they should be properly sourced and attributed. For what it's worth, And Eternity also has a relationship between an adult male and a teenage (underage) girl as I recall. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:26, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Every Piers Anthony book I've read includes a rape scene or at least an attempted rape scene. Clearly, this is a strange and sick preoccupation--a fetish that Anthony (at least at one point)felt the need to bring to life again and again on the pages of his books. I don't know if this is typical of his work as I haven't read anywhere near all of them.----As well, the overall general all-around eroticism of his books...I have likewise noted.

This is (I hope) a result of your having not read many of his books. I've read dozens, literally. This is not as widespread as you'd have us believe. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 09:49, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

You have, have you ? Did you read 'Heaven Cent', protagonist aged nine or 'Firefly' which features a sexual relation involving a child of five. The only sexual relation possible with a child of five is rape. Anthony is a pervert, end of story. Angusmclellan 13:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You certainly have a lot to say about a person's character based on the books they write. I truly believe this to be the case with Mr. Anthony, however. In his biography of a troll, he hints around the very issues mentioned in his fiction. He is also well known for inserting bestiality in his Xanth novels. Even necrophelia is not to obscene for his tastes. He couches it as harmless and as society not understanding, which is truly typical of a sexual deviant of his ilk. --Kerohazel 5 July 2005 18:57 (UTC)

I looked this up wondering if this question had been addressed in the Wiki article. There is truly some stomach-turning pedophila in Anthony's books - very disturbing stuff. The tendency for underage sex scenes between a man and young teenager or young girl should be addressed. It's very common in his books. We can't call him a "pedophile" for what he's written or imply anything about his proclivities, but we can certainly address that he's written these scenes over and over and over again. Does anyone have a list? Danlovejoy 22:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Uh, what? I'm reading Heaven Cent right now. Angus is extremely confused. The protagonist is indeed aged nine, and roughly every character they meet has a problem with that, and tries their damndest to keep any hint of sexuality away from him, despite that their world (like the real world) is full of sexuality. If anything, Piers' works are stuffy and prudish, or at least make fun of how prudish people tend to be... in regards to children and natural sexuality.

I always thought Piers Anthony was a dirty old man, but to claim that he "directly" advocates pedophilia because of something he wrote in a work of fiction isn't exactly fit for an encyclopedia. If he has in fact said something outside of his novels about this, then please find a quote and reference it. If it's just what's inside his books, then it's only suggestive of his dirty mind, and not direct. Either way, I think some references are in order. Somebody should get to work compiling a list of all pedophillic (sp?) acts in the xanth novels! (I'm kidding... One or two would probably be ok.) Pulsemeat 04:13, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Basically, his "underage" girls are usually physically mature and are 14 or over. The only exception I can think of is the book Firefly, which was intended to be shocking. I could go to my local library and look it over again so I can make some better comments - should I?

From Piers Anthony's December 2005 newsletter locatred at http://www.hipiers.com: "A reader notified me that the Wickpedia site http://en.wikipedia.org/ carries the charge that I endorse or advocate pedophilia and ecoterrorism. I think this is an example of a person showing more of what's on his mind than what's in my writing. The fact that I may address controversial subjects in my fiction, and have my characters participate in them, does not mean that this is my personal philosophy. Otherwise I would believe in magic, because there is magic in Xanth; be a murderer because murders sometimes occur in my fiction; and be a rapist or pedophile because my novel Firefly addresses those subjects. I did a long interview for Jitterbug Fantasia www.jitterbug.com, where such questions are addressed, coincidentally. I trust that readers who are conversant with my books and with this column will understand what I actually write, instead of what some anonymous critic wants to claim I write. I defend anonymity, and protect it in my ongoing survey of electronic publishers so that whistle blowers can't be retaliated against. But anonymity also serves to hide those who may have private agendas or confusions that don't relate to the truth, as was the case recently in that same survey. My critics have in the past tended to avoid facing me directly, because I don't suffer rascals gladly, and am not afraid to air their charges in a public forum such as this one. I mention once again the charge that I was being an ogre in fan conventions, spread before I ever attended a convention, and the charge that I wrote to Jerry Pournelle and called him a Nazi, but of course he never produced the letter, because it didn't exist. (Actually, in both cases they are thinking of Keith Laumer, who was one mean man after his stroke. He lived about 40 miles from me.) Less egregious instances apply to persistent rumors of my death (perhaps a confusion with Poul Anderson); every so often I have to assure a reader that I remain alive and ornery, despite the evident preference of some critics. Really, do you think that anyone else could mouth off the way I do in these columns?"

Gah! I guess I got the wrong impression from the Geodyssey series, then. Sorry about the ecoterrorism charge. CronoDAS 03:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

"Yes. What I consider sexual abuse are things like rape and subjugation. A fully voluntary and informed sexual relationship is something else. So I'd condemn a man raping a 40 year old woman, more than I would a man having consensual sex with a 15 year old girl. The problem is that young children don't know enough to make informed consent. So the age of consent laws help protect them. One thing children crave is love. Some adults teach them that love is identical to sex. Thus children can become willing, even eager sexual partners. This is nevertheless abuse." (from the interview on jitterbug) So I guess claiming that Piers Anthony promotes pedophily is quite irresponsible. Also, claiming that he advocates necrophilia and bestiality borders on moral fanatism. Soon people will come here and say that he promotes incest, muslim terrorism or rape. When it's all the contrary: most of Anthony's novels are precisely refreshing, 'cos when he touches upon such sensitive subjects, he doesn't condemns them blindly, he tries to see every aspect of it before passing judgment.(A thing some here should learn to do...) Yes, there may be some bestiality implied in the Xanth universe... but it's a fantasy world, dammit, where there are centaur, and other half-human/half-animal creatures. And also, I don't recall all the great ancient writers being called perverts, when in the greek myths Zeus took the form of a bull to seduce young ladys, thus giving birth to the Minotaur & co.

I personally feel that some mention of the possible pedophilia-type content of his books should be added in some form. It seems relevent, if only as a common mispreception. Manhatten Project 2000 05:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

If we add anything about pedophilia then we should by rights mention any illegal activity that he frequently writes about, as well as add notice of any material that is outside the bounds of a legal and conservative society to the page of any author that address the subject. As far as I can tell the original allegations have been made only by Wikipedia editors - if it's been brought up in public before then we should include it but otherwise I think it's best left alone. Anyone else agree? Graphia 03:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

It's also been discussed on Usenet as far back as 1996, though the biggest discussion on the subject took place in 2000. (Use "Piers Anthony pedophilia" as a search term)

In my expereience, some discussion of Anthony's predeliction for writing about the sexual exploits of underage girls has come up in every adult conversation I've had about his work, both in person and online, and this was true years before I'd ever even heard of Wikipedia. Any article about Anthony which does not adress this issue in some form is quite simply deficient.--12.77.10.161 06:47, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Having read most of Piers Anthony's novels, I find that he does sometimes write about pedophilia, such as in Firefly, yes there is a sexual relation involving a child of 5, but that is only one case. In Heaven Cent, the merwoman Mela tries to hide all hint of sexuality from the 9 year old boy, if you try to say that this promotes pedophilia and says that Peirs Anthony is a pedophiliac, then you might as well say that it discourages pedophilia by showing how disgusting it is.

Jomo Blurboid 26 March 06

List of potential pedophilia in Anthony novels

It seems to me that this argument is best served by bringing in data. My initial list is from memory, so please, anyone else with better information should contribute or edit my entries.

Refugee (Bio of a Space Tyrant 1): Teenage protagonist has a sexual relationship with a girl of similar age (who is a rape victim if I remember correctly). When she dies, he fantasizes about her, and the book strongly implies that he was in reality having sex with his 12-year-old sister.
Statesman (Bio of a Space Tyrant 5): The now aging protagonist engages in a sexual relationship with a young, functionally retarded girl.
The Mode series: The main protagonist is a teenage rape victim who enters a romantic (and I believe sexual) relationship with a man from another dimension.
And Eternity (Incarnations of Immortality 7): One of the protagonists, 15-yr-old rape victim, drug addict, and prostitute Vita seduces an adult judge who presided over her criminal trial.
Centaur Aisle (Xanth 4): While 16-yr-old friends Prince Dor and Princess Irene (no relation) are roughousing in a pool, Irene's top comes off. This one seems pretty innocent to me.
Heaven Cent (Xanth 11): Mela Merwoman, a widow, kidnaps 9-year-old Prince Dolph to be her new husband, although she doesn't plan to marry or have sex with him until he is of an appropriate age.
The Color of Her Panties (Xanth 15): He named a book in a juvenile series this; the plot turns on finding out, in fact, the color of the underwear worn by Mela.
Ghost: The middle-aged protagonist encounters and is later propositioned by several 13-15 year old girls sunbathing nude on a beach. He notes that society considers anyone with the physical signs of maturity capable of consent to a sexual liason. When the girls find out he's a member of the space service (looked down upon on Earth) they taunt and threaten him; the protagonist isn't sure whether the girls would really hurt him if they catch him or merely pretend subdue him and pretend-rape him. He says that such things had been known to happen and that he would be willing to submit if he knew that to be their goal.--Apascover 18:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
The Caterpillar's Question: The main character, Jack, enters a sexual relationship with Tappy, a 13-year-old girl suffering brain damage from a airplane accident. --Apascover 07:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Just gotta refute some of these:

"The Mode series: The main protagonist is a teenage rape victim" -- not pedophilia; teenagers are not pre-pubescent; possible ephebophilia

"And Eternity (Incarnations of Immortality 7): One of the protagonists, 15-yr-old rape victim, drug addict, and prostitute" -- not pedophilia; teenagers are not pre-pubescent; possible ephebophilia

"Centaur Aisle (Xanth 4): While 16-yr-old friends Prince Dor and Princess Irene": not pedophilia; teenagers are not pre-pubescent; possible ephebophilia

"Heaven Cent (Xanth 11): Mela Merwoman, a widow, kidnaps 9-year-old Prince Dolph to be her new husband, although she doesn't plan to marry or have sex with him until he is of an appropriate age.": Thanks to your qualifier, not seeing any hint of pedophilia here.

"The Color of Her Panties (Xanth 15): He named a book in a juvenile series this; the plot turns on finding out, in fact, the color of the underwear worn by Mela.": Not seeing any hint of pedophilia here; underwear isn't sex. (Horribly awkward title though.)

"Ghost: The middle-aged protagonist encounters and is later propositioned by several 13-15 year old girls sunbathing nude on a beach.": not pedophilia; teenagers are not pre-pubescent; possible ephebophilia

"The Caterpillar's Question: The main character, Jack, enters a sexual relationship with Tappy, a 13-year-old girl": not pedophilia; teenagers are not pre-pubescent; possible ephebophilia

It's interesting that you would go to the trouble to make such a list, though. Did you enjoy making the list? Hm. 4.226.111.122 23:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

The Mode series actually centers around Colene's fear of intercourse because of her rape. While she and Darius, who is from another dimension in which the age of consent is basically non-existent, do "make out," they don't have intercourse until after they are legally married on Earth (with her parents' written permission). If anything, the point is how damaging underage sex can be to the participants--she was raped in the first place because she was dating an older boy she didn't know very well. IrisWings 21:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The point is he frequently writes about people well below the age of consent engaging in sex, occasionally with adults. Perhaps ephebophilia is a more correct term in some of these cases, but not all. It's just a more accurate term, not a refutation. Manhatten Project 2000 01:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Below what age of consent, though? As you surely know, age of consent varies wildly from one place and time to another; even in the United States, age of consent is different in every state, ranging anywhere from 12 to 18 (with 16 being the most common). Some places in the world don't have an age of consent; ages of consent were different in the past and will almost certainly be different in the future. And that's only taking our own world into account -- when you're dealing with fantasy and science fiction, it's foolish to assume that completely different planets, alternate realities, and magical fantasy worlds all have the same age of consent as your home state. Also, in many/most places (but not in other places such as the UK), people under the age of consent can have sex with other people of a similar age, just not with older people. 4.89.247.62 15:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Well in Florida where he lives, it's 16/18. Most people consider 16 to be the line +/- 2 years, although it obviously varies person to person, culture to culture. I personally find it really odd that a 70 year old man considers it normal to frequently write about the sexual exploits of teenaged girls or younger, and I think more people than not agree. Age of consent doesn't really need to be mentioned, per say. Manhatten Project 2000 04:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Can I just say that this is pure foolishness? Just as someone wirtes something, does by no means make them what they write. Take King. Just because death and killing are in near all the stories he's writen, does that mean that he is a psychopathic murderer? Should the idea be any different than Peirs' and "Pedophilia" than with King and Killing? 216.56.38.130 12:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Ironic you should mention King, particularly. I read an article once where he mused that without the outlet of writing, he may indeed have been a murderer. Not seriously, of course, but interesting nonetheless. This is all still quite silly, as obviously King is not a murderer any more than Anthony is a pedophile. 67.170.167.25 08:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

However, you would mention that King commonly writes about killing, no? Regardless of how you think about it, adolescents engaging in sex acts are a common theme in his work. I'm not saying the article should read something like, "Piers often writes about teenagers having sex and running aground naked. Obviously he is a sick individual." I'm saying it should be mentioned, as it is an extremely common element in his stories. Perhaps as criticism. Manhatten Project 2000 06:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm flabberghasted this ridiculous allegation is still in print on wikipedia frankly, you do seem to have missed the point of Mr Anthony's remarkably temporate reply. If you can not see sense at least move it to a point where it attaches to a discussion of the novels. I will do this. 62.25.109.196 15:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The novels "Firefly" and "Tatham Mound" both have PEDOPHILIC references. While we can argue about the age of consent all day, it would be silly to argue that a 5 year old girl is of age in ANY culture. In "Firefly" Anthony has a child of this age "seducing" older adult males. Oh, and since she's 5 it's blatent pedophilia, while 12 and 13 is borderline since many girls don't begin menstrating until highschool.

I agree whole heartedly with the comment above me. Child sex is NEVER ok. I don't care if you do write fiction. You can't "create" any world where this is acceptable. To all the nay-sayers that defend Mr. Anthony I would have only one question..Would you as a parent allow your young daughter to be left alone in the company of Piers Anthony after reading his novels? My answer would be no way in hell. Never. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.130.40.221 (talk) 17:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I love PA's books, and after reading a bunch of them, I noticed the underage sex thing he likes to include, in a number of them. It's not up to us to judge anything, but if we can find reliable sources that talk about it, we should include what they say. No more, no less. - Peregrine Fisher 06:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Rather than using aggressive and accusatory language such as "pedophilia", it would probably be better to use terms such as "teenage sex" or "sexually active adolescent characters". Comparison might be made to Judy Blume, who is not usually accused of being a pedophile for writing about sexual thoughts and activity among teenagers. --FOo 02:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

In the Mode series article, I referred to these themes as "child and adolescent sexuality."

I have read a great deal of Anthony's work, and adolescent sexuality is an especially prevalent theme, as is sexual abuse and rape. I wouldn't say that "pedophilia" is a common theme, since my understanding of that term is that it constitutes sexual and romantic attraction to children, not just a desire to control or abuse them. Nor would I say that "ephebophilia" is especially common: while many of the teenagers in Anthony's works do carry on relationships (sometimes sexual) with adults, those relationships are usually instigated by the teenagers--the adult partners are not exclusively attracted to adolescents, and in many cases are quite reluctant to pursue sexual consummation. IrisWings 21:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

A lot of the counter-arguments to inclusion of this information in the article rely on semantics (ie, what the definition of what pedophilia really is) or arguements regarding that writing about something does not automatically mean someone supports it. Also, the fact that some of these encounters are initiated by the minor are irrelevant; try using that as a defense in court against charges of statuatory rape. The fact of the matter is that sexual encounters, consentual or otherwise, involving minors do appear quite frequently in Piers Anthony's works, and has been a subject of controversy and discussion for quite some time. Any encyclopedic article on Piers Anthony would be incomplete without mentioning it in some way, as long as it sticks to the facts about the controversy. Timawalker (talk) 19:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Just for comparison: In the Holy Bible, there's this character called Lot who's made drunk and seduced by his own two daughters who get pregnant. Jeez, what a pervert the guy who wrote that book must have been! Maybe, Anthony's butt got busted by a catholic priest when he was ten years old, and his subconsciousness is forcing him to re-live this experience? Of course, this is just speculation. We cannot see what is going on in another man's mind. 84.152.225.128 (talk) 09:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Warning! Piers Anthony novels contain explicit portrayals of things that are real!137.229.70.176 (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh, stop. Piers Anthony writes what he does because that's what people buy. In his early days, he was a great writer ( see Omnivore, Orn, OX, or Macroscope, etc) he has pretty clearly said in his newsletter that the reason he writes horrible drek these days is they sell tons of copies. Based on his level of artistic integrity his prediliction for writing pedophilia says more about society than it says about him. 75.191.157.40 (talk) 01:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC) I think Firefly is the most damning of them all... it is insanely explicit and graphic until very recently someone drawing a picture of even a small part of what he clearly describes would have been arrested and thrown in jail, and the message is that the act with the neighbor was consensual and ok, while the acts by the girls father and brother go unpunished and are to be seen as the true wrong, btw I read firefly when I was 10 years old because my mother bought it for me because I was a fan of the Xanth novels... it was disturbing to say the least. There is no doubt in my mind that Anthony at least believes that so called "consensual" behavior is ok... my belief doesn't make it true but there is certainly plenty of evidence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.44.253 (talk) 07:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

There are a lot of things out in the media that are pretty sick like the Silent Hill movies. Are all people who write murder novels murderers? Tom Clancy wrote about a handicapped kid who got shot in the chest, what sort of animal do you make him out to be? They showed Patrick's underwear in the Spongebob movie! I'm not an expert on Piers Anthony, but none of the scenes that I've read where something really bad happens is ever justified as good - indeed the main characters seemed to be pretty repulsed by it. As far as the panties thing goes, honestly. There are kids books about poop and How to Eat Fried Worms. Mentor397 (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

In one of the Author's Notes at the end of one of his books (I can't recall which) I recall being creeped out by his talking about how his teenaged daughters were developing attractive breasts. 12.40.5.69 (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Why not simply have a section discussing sexuality in his novels. Have it touch on some of the issues discussed in this talk section, then make sure it quotes Piers Anthony's response to the controversy. I realize that some believe that this is not fair considering he includes murder and such in his novels. I would have to say that many novels have violence and murder in them, however, not many novels bringing up sexual issues quite the way Piers Anthony does. Naming the section "Pedophillia" is probably going overboard on this issue. Yet, sexual issues should be addressed here. --Logon Aergon (talk) 22:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Clean up

An anonymous editor wrote quite a bit of bio info that isn't sourced. It's a little bit POV and needs a tiny bit of polishing, so I've added clean-up tag. I wonder about the structure of the article now. "Early life and career" looks kind of strange where it sits now. Dan Lovejoy 03:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

The information is straight from the the two autobiographies. I've read both.151.205.180.171 18:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Great! Please cite them. Dan Lovejoy 18:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

How does one create a link to an autobiography that's only available in offline format?151.205.180.171 18:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

You don't create a link, just a citation, like this.

Also, what's a Preditor? Dan Lovejoy 03:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Preditors and Editors ("Preditor" is a play on the words "predator" and "editor")is an organization dedicated to protecting writers from unscrupolous agents/publishers/contracts/etc. Their main purpose is to expose scams that exploit writers.151.205.180.171 18:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Oh, OK. I don't think this word is appropriate in this context as it is a neologism and readers are unlikely to understand it.

Thanks for your contributions! Dan Lovejoy 18:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

No, it's not a neologism. It's the actual name of the organization. http://www.anotherealm.com/prededitors/pubabout.htm 151.205.180.171 18:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Ok, see my changes and let me know what you think about it. Dan Lovejoy 20:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Biography?

I think the article has too much biographical information and not enough author treatment. Yes, we should get the outline, he attended college here, then army there, then marriage, then children--but I'm not sure going much further is useful, and I think what should be in its place is some explication about his writing. When I read about a physicist, for example, I expect to read more about what he or she discovered in science than about their personal life, the same is true of authors. I vote: prune the biography and tell us about Piers Anthony, THE AUTHOR. Anyone else with me? --Fuhghettaboutit 00:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I agree wholeheartedly. I'll try to play around with it a little, but it's going to be rough and I doubt it'll be appropriately objective on a first pass.--Apascover 07:54, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Upon further consideration, let me revise my view -- I think that the biographical info in the article needs to be cleaned up and reundancy eliminated, but I think it doesn't really need a pruning. In my opinion there isn't a lot of extraneous material there and a lot of bio info is particularly appropriate for a writer like Anthony who typically includes long, detailed biographical author's notes in many books.--Apascover 19:08, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Added book number

I know this was a little pointless, but I added the number of books he has written.

Xanth Family Trees collaborator

Would it be appropriate to have a little tiny mini-bio of the other author of the Xanth Family Trees on the Xanth page? (I know her.)

Lady Aleena 09:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Piers' reaction to his Wikipedia entry

I actually thought this was interesting, both to see how he views it, and for his corrections/criticisms. Someone who is more skilled with their wiki-fu than I may wish to incorperate some of it into the article. (posted here because it takes a while to sift through his behemoths of newsletters, entertaining though they may be) --Kuhan 05:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

"I looked up my entry in Wikipedia. For folk slow on the uptake, as I am, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia whose entries are made by anyone who walks in off the street, and can be changed by anyone. So utter accuracy is not to be expected, and we don't see it here. Still, it's about as good as professional bios are, and will probably improve as further corrections are made. Errors are approximate, rather than malicious. The version I saw in May 5, 2006, said that I won the Special Recognition for Service to Writers award from Preditors and Editors for my ongoing survey of electronic publishers. No; the P&E recognition was for my Hipiers site, given before I started the survey. It was EPIC that gave an award for the survey. Wikipedia said I was a venture capitalist, investing in a publishing house since bought out by Random House. No; I invested as an angel capitalist in Xlibris, and am now a co-owner along with Random House. One of the anomalies of this situation is that I generally see eye to eye with Random House on this. Who would have thunk it? Wikipedia says I also invested in vegetarian foodstuffs related technologies. I have not. It says I believe I was blacklisted at one time. That makes it seem as if I imagined it. Yeah? I was blacklisted by Ballantine Books for six years because I complained and got a lawyer when they cheated me. They badmouthed me to maybe half a dozen other publishers so that I could not sell to them either. Then Random House took over Ballantine and the blacklist was lifted—they knew the real story—and I became a bestseller there, in its Del Rey imprint. Most, perhaps all, of the blacklisters are long since out of business or in greatly reduced circumstances, while I prosper."

Newsletter Entry

Proposed works in the Bibliography

These belong on fan pages, not on a Wikipedia entry... —X S G 15:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

American or British Author?

Piers was born in England. But he moved to America as a child, and began writing books 20 years after living in Florida. My librarian says that makes him not an American author. ? --Can Not 22:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Isaac Asimov is generally considered to be a “Russian-born American author” and suspect similar wording should be used for Piers. His web site, www.hipiers.com/06june.html, says "I left England when I was four years old and never went back." Marc Kupper (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

My English Teacher let me call him an American Author **** YOU LIBRARY! --Can Not 23:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Firefly kerfluffle

Something should possibly be introduced about the kerfluffle over his novel Firefly and the censored "Author's Note" which (according to some allegations) justified/explained/defended sexual encounters involving a five-year-old. One such item was just deleted from this article (properly so, because it was unsourced and not NPOV in tone). Is there anything solid on this from reliable sources that does not depend simply on Anthony's self-defense? Most of what I'm finding by Google is in blogs and other non-reliable sources. Can somebody find something in Locus or a newspaper archive somewhere? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Note about this talk page

This talk page is for discussions about improving the article. Additionally, please observe WP:BLP. "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." This applies to this talk page as well as the article. --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the above -- I have found that people who write these articles don't want input of any kind -- not even on the so-called "talk" page. They are very intolerant in this way. These people who hide behind fictitious handles instead of their real names delete any contribution to the "talk" page when its something not to their liking -- which is most of the time. --Mccommas (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

"What of Earth" and reputation

Not sure why the "What of Earth" section takes up so much of the article -- from what appears, it seems to have been a nasty but somewhat minor publishing squabble resolved 30 years ago. Also, there should be something on his general reputation -- some of of his early works such as Macroscope and Rings of Ice etc. are fairly well-respected, but a very significant number of people among hard-core science fiction fandom regard him as having cashed in on somewhat puerile cookie-cutter works of little ultimate value (such as most of the Xanth, and Apprentice Adept books, etc.) -- it was a regular topic of discussion on Usenet's "rec.arts.sf.written" whenever Anthony's name came up, etc... AnonMoos (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2009

Concur. The discussion of But What of Earth seems like a clear undue weight issue. john k (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

I've trimmed it down and attempted to improve the wording. —Torchiest ^talk/_edits 12:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

I've removed this section entirely, as it was lacking in sources of any kind. Perhaps it wasn't much of a BLP issue, as it didn't reflect too badly on Anthony himself (and the two people it did reflect badly on, Roger Elwood and Robert Coulson, are both dead), but even so I don't think it belongs in the article without some kind of source to demonstrate that it was significant enough to be worth mentioning. Robofish (talk) 22:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to clarify that the removed material reflected poorly on Elwood, not on Buck Coulson. Buck was not accused of being at fault for what Elwood told him; just of edits that Anthony didn't like (a question of artistic judgement, not of ethics). --Orange Mike | Talk 14:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC) (knew Buck; knows Juanita)

The Cluster series page refers to this removed material, and that page should be corrected. The same applies to the bibliography on the 'But What of Earth?' line. I was interested in reading about this squabble, and as a member of the general public, I would like to see the deleted material added to a 'But What of Earth?' page, if it has no place in the main Piers Anthony article.68.97.202.205 (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

I came for the missing info as well. Considering that Anthony has discussed many of his disputes with publishers in his bios etc, I'd think a line or two about this *particular* issue (explaining the extra "author" listed in Wikipedia) would serve as a very pertinent example of the things he has faced. Regarding sources, has he not written about it himself? or is that not considered a good source?

As stated above, the other two parties are deceased so that's okay. I wouldn't want an epic saga, just a line or two. This article is awfully thin as it stands. Ukrpickaxe (talk) 01:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Reputation among SF fans

There still should be some way to indicate that his general reputation among regular science-fiction readers has declined precipitously beginning around 1976 or 1977... AnonMoos (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Given Anthony's autobiographies, it is clear that criticism of his fantasy works repeatedly appeared in print by reputable sources (he should have laughed all the way to the bank!) If you can cite a published literary review this could be added. Along with it, though, should appear his note of why he started writing fantasy (some sort of non-compete with a publisher, I can't recall.) The criticism has certainly been a (hurtful) part of his life, although insulting and imho unnecessary. With Sources, it should be acceptable: we are documenting that it has been *written*, which is an indisputable fact - *not* opining on its' truth.Ukrpickaxe (talk) 01:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)