Talk:Political libel
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Are the Canadian cases political libel or just libel? Is Canadian libel law really more pro plaintiff than the libel law of England and Wales? The Canadian stuff looks like it needs an expert eye. Secretlondon 15:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Added "bias" template for just this reason. Revived 22:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Do Prime Ministers sue the Official Opposition in any other country using common law? No. The Harper case ought to settle the issue. The premise of the article that this an archaic curiosity that happens only in Canada seems to have been well validated by recent events. There are also a few other minor cases involving Gerard Kennedy and the National Post, many petty politicians suing each other in New Brunswick, and even the Premier of Saskatchewan, Brad Wall, filing such a suit that he quickly withdrew. It's difficult or impossible to represent the motives of any of these suits as other than political positioning. Certainly no provable damages are involved.
- Read the references - the Canadian laws provide for only a very narrow exemption for comment within the legislature. Even when those exact comments are cited in a press release or press report, they are not priveleged, no matter how important the public issue nor how prominent the advocate nor how widespread the opinion. This is so much narrower an exemption than in any other common law country that it allows for libel suits to be used to political ends. If there are even one half as many such cases per capita in any other common law country then it might be possible to argue that there is no qualitative difference in the libel laws. However given the situation as it stands, the Harper case seems to settle the issue of whether or not there is any strange unique aspect to Canadian libel law. So the bias check tag will come off if there is no objection? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.78.212 (talk) 22:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080302105906/http://www.theglobeandmail.com:80/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home to http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080227.wcadmann0227/BNStory/National/home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315032157/http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w to http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWO1n_uKv1ZkQkkH9xh-ZpouAj2w
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2009/2009bcsc406/2009bcsc406.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2006/2006canlii12970/2006canlii12970.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Political libel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153055/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx to http://www.liberal.ca/story_13642_e.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201153047/http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx to http://www.liberal.ca/story_13635_e.aspx
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.thestar.com/fpLarge/video/308220
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class politics articles
- NA-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Redirect-Class law articles
- NA-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Redirect-Class Canada-related articles
- NA-importance Canada-related articles
- Redirect-Class Canadian law articles
- NA-importance Canadian law articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages