Talk:QuackShot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article QuackShot has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
July 8, 2014 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Video games (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Sega task force.
 

Japanese title[edit]

Is the japanese title really "Alive!" (アライブ, I think)? because in the japanese cover at Moby games (1, )
it reads アイラブ (airabu) ドナルドダック - グルジア王の秘宝 .

I think it translates to somemething like "I love Donald Duck - Georgia's King treasure",
could anyone with a better knowledge of japanese to confirm this?.
200.64.221.132 04:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)g_z

Did it last week, without reading this first.:) Should be right now, although the "I love Donald Duck" phrase appears only on the cover, not within the game.80.142.254.36 15:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

File:Quackshot Cover Art.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Quackshot Cover Art.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Development[edit]

Why is there no development section? Some information on what was going through the dev's heads is needed for the GA process's completeness criterion czar  02:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:QuackShot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 01:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I'll take this one up Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Fact tag in the infobox needs addressing
    • Done. Assuming "Fact tag" meant the "[citation needed]" next to Sega AM8, I couldn't find any sources that indicated that they played any role in developing the game, so it was removed. Disney Interactive Studios remains the sole developer of the game.
  • Per WP:LEAD, this article should not have a three-paragraph lead as it only has 6503 characters
    • Done. Two paragraphs should be good.
  • For that matter, too much of the lead is not mentioned in the article's body, with "Much of the game is patterned after the first three Indiana Jones films." and the entire second paragraph not being mentioned anywhere else. Please rectify
    • Done. I replaced the sentence that referenced Indiana Jones with a mention of the Illusion series (which *is* mentioned later). The entire second paragraph was re-written and moved down to become the short development section - I hope that's okay, since (as far as I can tell) there's not a whole lot of sources that can be used to talk about the development of the game.
  • A screenshot of the title screen is not warranted per WP:NFCC#8
    • Done. I removed it.
  • A short development section should be added. Even if there's nothing out there, you can still briefly describe the studios who developed it.
    • Done. See my response to your 3rd bullet point above.
  • "the graphics are excellent, but the game is easy to complete." Needs a source
    • Done. I added the same ref that was used for MegaTech magazine's review score (the quote is from the magazine).
  • The reception section is just a summary of Buchanan and Butt's reviews. There should be more reviews added if you can find them
    • Done, kinda. I re-wrote the Reception section to focus on the game's praise first, followed by its criticisms. The second paragraph (the game's criticisms) is still mostly a summary of Buchanan and Butt's reviews (those are the most prolific reviews I could find), though I did find a short GameTrailers review that I included in there. I think it's definitely a better Reception section than before as far as flow is concerned.

Overall I think this a promising GA nominee and will give you a week to address these points. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 17:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I did my best to address your points. Please let me know what you think! — SolarStarSpire (talk) 00:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)