Talk:Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge

A fact from Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 1944 the Barsala tourist lodge in Azad Kashmir hosted the future founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/July.

Wikipedia

Requested move 15 January 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge – not much evidence either way, but it removes unnecessary location and treats it as a proper name. No such user (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quaid-e-Azam tourist lodge, Barsala → Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge, Barsala – Moved from contested & removed RM/T(linked).

Original reasoning:

Capitalize the title as it is a notable museum/attraction. @2400:ADC1:468:400:C488:6D72:FEAA:632E

@Eejit43: (ping RM/T contester) BhamBoi (talk) 00:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following up with original contesting reasoning: One main source, https://www.dawn.com/news/1407033, refers to it as "Barsala Tourist Lodge" and "Quaid-i-Azam Memorial Rest House", and others use "Quaid-e-Azam Memorial Hut", and others interchange capitalization. Back in 2014 when this was a DYK, it was referred to as "Barsala tourist lodge". I think we should decided on whatever the offical or most common name is, so that this page doesn't end up being moved multiple times. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 01:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Would appear to be a proper name. But what's wrong with simple Quaid-e-Azam Tourist Lodge? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just looking for reliable sources referring to it as that, I've had a hard time finding a definitive correct name. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.