Jump to content

Talk:Randy Edsall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maryland section bias

[edit]

Marylad fans are angry with Edsall after the poor 2011 season. As such this section is riddled with bias.Lebanonman19 (talk) 23:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's because he sucked as a football coach, took credit for wins, and threw his players under the bus ("they didn't do this, didn't do that") when they lost. The Edsall years were a distinct nadir of Maryland football. 137.103.85.33 (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is hardly a bias-riddled one, unless you are categorizing it as a pro-Edsall vehicle. It neglects to address his terminating of a number of team and fan traditions, and the departure of a number of high-quality, good-character players, that decimated the team, compounded by highly questionable personnel decisions regarding those left behind. The commenter below has a far more accurate take on Edsall's progress -- or lack thereof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.101.1.120 (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His bio should mention his struggles and failures in coaching along with successes. In doing so it is important to not he was 2-10 at Maryland with never before seen transfers, loss of donors, lack of ticket sales, etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.95.80 (talk) 07:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]