Talk:Relentless Software

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Alexander, Leigh (27 May 2011). "Gamasutra - News - Interview: Quizzing Relentless On The New Social Landscape". gamasutra.com. Retrieved 27 May 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link)
Brown, Nathan (15 June 2011). "Relentless: exclusivity 'a blessing and a curse' - Edge Magazine". next-gen.biz. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
http://www.gamesradar.com/andrew-eades-recounts-highs-and-lows-12-years-relentless-software/

WP:VG Assessment

Missing content

Background of its founders (What skill sets did David Amor and Andrew Eades have and bring to their creation? This can be helpful in context.)
Headcount, organization (especially the first)
Location, office setup
Culture (its motto is, somewhat, in the History section)
Private or publicly listed company?
Any notable contributions besides video games (prominent charity events, or community projects)?

Improvements to be made

Copyediting required: "Amor and Eades persuaded SCEE [...] Much to their shock, SCEE agreed [...]" — "persuaded" would have meant they successfully done so, hence the later clause would be redundant; furthermore, "much to their shock" is informal and unencyclopaedic. Various "noun plus -ing" issues (refer to User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises#A common problem—noun plus -ing. Several one- or two-sentence paragraphs. MOS violations (no "&" please).

Missing content is the primary reason for my grading of this as "C"-class. The company's relatively small scale notability and its single product line leaves its importance to the WP:VG project as low. Jappalang (talk) 00:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]