Talk:Rick Snyder

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Michigan High‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Governors Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors.

Archives

Archive 1

Lead poisoning in Flint

This article is blatantly and obviously Republican propaganda. Wikipedia is not a site for hagiography and self-promotion. This entire article will now be rewritten with a neutral point of view. The new article will address the most notable and famous episode of Rick Snyder's life, which is his intentional poisoning of the citizens of Flint, Michigan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:a280:9b00:11b2:3bde:595f:7444 (talk) 13:17, December 19, 2015‎

I've added some further detail about the water crisis in Flint. Are there other parts of the article that are imbalanced? gobonobo ⁺ ^c 21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove "the Michigan Chapter of The Nature Conservancy" from the following sentence: He serves on the boards of the U.S. National Historic Landmark Henry Ford Museum and Greenfield Village, the Michigan chapter of the Nature Conservancy, and several boards associated with the University of Michigan. Add this sentence directly following that to say: "He served on The Nature Conservancy's Michigan Board of Trustees from 2005 to 2010." 209.252.215.42 (talk) 20:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely, The Nature Conservancy

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 21:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.nature.org/cs/groups/webcontent/@web/@michigan/documents/document/prd_053137.pdf refers to him as “Former Trustee” but doesn’t give the dates of his term. El Mariachi (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rick Snyder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Rick Snyder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on presence of -elect successors in infobox

Hi, @GoodDay:, my edit to remove the governor-elect from the infobox successor field was reverted by this edit, with the comment, "We show the governors-elect". I would like to get some clarification on this, since the instructions for {{Infobox officeholder}} say not to include -elect or -designate successors, or the end of an incumbent's term, until such an event actually transpires. This guideline seems to say the infobox should represent reality as exists today, not as it may be one day—the governor-elect is not currently the successor to the governor, though she will become his successor once his term ends and she is sworn in. Where is the guideline that gives the opposite guidance? Sarcasmboy (talk) 08:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For years, it's been the practice on political bios to show an individual's successor-to-be in the infobox. For example, check across the articles of the current lame-duck US governors & lieutenant governors & you'll see their successors-to-be mentioned. GoodDay (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay: Thank you for the response. I think that, if this is indeed where the consensus is on this topic, the instructions for {{Infobox officeholder}} should be updated to reflect that. At the moment, they are in conflict with the practice as you describe. I will say, it does still seem inconsistent to me to list the successor-elect but not list the end of term, since these are linked to the same actual event, the swearing in of his successor. If he were to leave office early, both the term-end and successor would be different. Sarcasmboy (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's an Rfc currently opened, concerning whether or not to show the successors-to-be in the infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two related Rfcs on this matter at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government. -- GoodDay (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Snyder exonerated

May someone please add that the charges have been dropped? Thank you.

https://twitter.com/Phil_Lewis_/status/1601282053982474241?s=20&t=VZZ96XQC9KsgBOrr0W-S7Q Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 13:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is done Prunklethefox (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prunklethefox No, it's not. Once again mention of the charges being dropped it's missing from the article. Who keeps removing it? 47.132.127.113 (talk) 01:04, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes it is. The last sentence in the main body of the article says they were dismissed in December of 2022 and cites the Judge's name as well.

Please read carefully. If you still don't see it, I'm not sure how I can help. Prunklethefox (talk) 05:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prunklethefox This is just sloppy editing. Purposely omitting the context of the indictment. The judge who performed a one man grand jury and the embarrassment of being corrected by an upper court. All of which was blatant political persecution, the likes of which we're seeing played out continually. 47.132.127.113 (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exonerated

The one person grand jury, a judge from outside the Flint district, did not have the authority to indict Snyder. https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/us/flint-michigan-rick-snyder-water-crisis/index.html All charges were dismissed. Why does this get removed from the article? 47.132.127.113 (talk) 01:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would imagine it's because dropped charges do not meet the definition of "Exoneration". Prunklethefox (talk) 05:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prunklethefox please look up the definition of exonerated. 47.132.127.113 (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exonerated

Exoneration requires conviction.

Prunklethefox (talk) 09:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]