This article was nominated for deletion on 24 August 2012. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This is my first created article after I finally took the plunge and created a username, so I want to be sure it is very good quality. I was surprised this article did not already exist, as it clearly meets WP:POLITICIAN. There are a few touch-ups I plan to make tomorrow or the next day, but obviously anyone who comes along is free to improve it also! • Comrade Napoleon •07:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'm not fully convinced that this article satisfies either WP:POLITICIAN or the general WP:PEOPLE criterion. Does an appointed state-level deputy superintendent of public instruction meet the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN? The three cited sources do appear to be independent of each other, but I'd prefer to see more non-Oregon sources in order to be fully convinced that this person satisfies the notability requirements. I'm also concerned that the article itself is trying to equally cover both Saxton and the Oregon state educational system (see WP:COATRACK#The Flea). I'm halfway inclined to nominate the article for deletion, but I'm hoping to hear from some other experienced editors first and see what they might think. — Richwales03:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I read the Oregon State Constitution Article 8. Section 1 makes the Governor of Oregon Superintendent of Public Instruction but within 5 years of the adoption of the Oregon Constitution the Oregon Legislative Assembly needs to provide for an elective Superintendent of Public Instruction. I am therefore incline to give good faith and keep the article as is because of the constitutional provision. The deputy superintendent is doing the administrative work. It is possible Oregon might switch back to an elective superintendent of public instruction unless there is a constitutional amendment changing this. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that being a state-level deputy superintendent of public instruction is notable in its own right, and that unless the subject of the article is notable for other things in his life I would be inclined to nominate the article for deletion. BabelStone (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How is this section relevant to this person? It discusses a restructuring of education system in Oregon. It may be suitable to Oregon article, but I wonder if the info is suitable for this biography. --George Ho (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Removing Promotional Tone and Irrelevant Information
I made a series of changes today to remove the promotional tone of the article. I also removed quite a bit of content that was providing a history of the establishment of a position this individual occupied for three years. However, I doubt this article is sufficiently notable. I'll nominate it for deletion in a few months if no one changes my mind. QuintinK (talk) 05:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After thinking further, the article "Tigard-Tualatin Superintendent Rob Saxton chosen to lead Oregon public schools" is sufficient to meet WP:GNG. The subject does not seem to meet WP:NPOL, but does meet GNG. QuintinK (talk) 21:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
