Talk:Rubina Dilaik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Comment)[edit]

Rubina and Avinash are a couple

Avinash who?
They have denied it. See Rubina and Avinash rubbish rumours of their marriage. --Neelkamala (talk) 09:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Divorce matter[edit]

Hi User:Cyphoidbomb is this in here [1] is gossip or not please can you clarify to User:Kartiksingh12345 as he keeps re adding it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kartiksingh12345 Why are you adding irrelevant gossip in Rubina Dilaik we only add that if the divorce have happened. Please reply and explain. User:Cyphoidbomb please block him please as he is adding pure gossip in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 12:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kartiksingh12345 Please answer us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rubina has confessed her divorce case in order to win the task, which was clearly mentioned by the show. so, it has to be mentioned — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartiksingh12345 (talkcontribs) 13:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn’t it is pure gossip we don’t add gossip Kartiksingh12345 Cyphoid please block him for vandalising Wikipedia pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 13:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring read this and Don't revert your edits otherwise both will be blocked. There is three revert rule ,so discuss it properly on talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:A680:B79C:8AA2:368C:7572:5055 (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Kartiksingh12345: You need to employ a little circumspection here. Reality shows are entertainment and are often scripted, or partially scripted. Regardless of whether or not the information is true, there is no long-term academic value to pointing out that a married couple had some marital strife. This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip rag. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
IP 109... your reversions are well-meaning, but you still need to discuss them on the talk page if you find yourself reverting edits more than three times within a 24-hour period. The revision history looks like an edit war and both of you have engaged in it.
IP 2405... if you can't discuss the issue on the talk page and immediately call for attention for edit warring after it's been moved to the talk page, you shouldn't be editing. This is a community editing project and you should be participating if you're that interested to end the issue. If you want others to properly discuss it on the talk page, you should also do the same.
Kartiksingh12345, an encyclopedia doesn't care what problems went on in their personal life. Why would we intervene in their personal life in that manner? Only if the divorce did happen, then it's included. What if she said she really loves her hubby so much that she always makes breakfast for him? Would we mention that? No. Fizconiz (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyphoidbomb again the user thought of re adding it with an IP address over here User:103.92.41.208 can you please protect Rubinas page. See here [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 17:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC) User:Kartiksingh12345 Logged off and used IP address thinking we won’t know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 17:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyphoidbomb the user had done it again here in Abhinav Shukla with now a third different account User:Leo.m7400 added gossip. [3] User:Kartiksingh12345 and also adding unreliable and irrelevant sources in VJ Andy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.70.191 (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyphoidbomb Can you protect this page because they are many users who are writing abusive comments, wrong information and writing gossips. you can talk to user:103.67.158.126  and user:Chennatsum for writing wrong information

Keep this page private as many haters come and bark irregular stufs for celebrities. These people just want to spread negativity. I love Rubina Dilaik. RubinaEcstasy (talk) 06:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rubinas Date of year[edit]

User:Fizconiz User:Cyphoidbomb User:Ab207 people are keep changing Rubina Dilaik's date of birth year when the source says she was 30 in 2017. People keep changing it to 1989. User:Livingonthecotedazur

Rubina herself mentioned in bigg boss 14 live that she borned in 1989 Ashriya1001 (talk) 12:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2021[edit]

Plz change rubina dilaik ‘s age she is 1989 born not 1987 2405:201:5502:16E:5C9B:6BDE:9524:DAA1 (talk) 10:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Nitesh003 (talk) 10:21, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2021 (2)[edit]

Rubina Dilaik date of birth- 26 August,1989 ,Age -31 2405:201:5502:16E:5C9B:6BDE:9524:DAA1 (talk) 10:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Nitesh003 (talk) 10:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2021[edit]

Rubina mentioned in BIG BOSS 14 that she was born in 1989 not 1987 I am unable to post the link here since the keep saying youtube URLs are blacklisted PShaw809456 (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2021[edit]

Her Date Of Birth is 26 August 1989 not 26 August 1987. She has cleared her age in big boss 14 with rahul vaidya Ramsingh34 (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —Sirdog (talk) 15:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]