Talk:Rurouni Kenshin/Archive 1

Sorry!

While trying to put a fact in I somehow lost everything after it and am still trying to get it back. This wasn't vandalism and I'm still trying to figure out just what happened. Katsuhagi 21:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

• Managed to get it back, still not sure what that was, maybe bad code. Katsuhagi 21:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Artist's mistakes

In relation to Arisa's trivia about an artist's mistake, I recall that in volume 17 Saito is shown first with the bandages on his legs, but they dissapear and reappear in several panels. Just thought I'd point that out as a possible addition.Katsuhagi 01:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Possibly innapropriate link

In the links section under "A site with Rurouni Kenshin videos" is a German AMV site. I believe this was likely put in as self-promotion and is not appropriate for this type of article, hence I believe it should be removed. --Katsuhagi 00:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Naming

I would recommend that we use the English name convention of displaying given names before surnames (i.e., "Kenshin Himura" not "Himura Kenshin") when possible to avoid confusion for those who do not understand the Japanese conventions (and for the sake of uniformity throughout the Wikipedia).

RadicalBender 22:46, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I agree with Radical Bender that the anime and manga should get separate articles because of the disparity of the endings. The anime/OVA ends with Kenshin and Kaoru dying, while the manga ends with them clearly alive and happy together. The timelines are NOT compatible and I've run into many confused fans that I've had to explain this to. Jinchuu Crusader 06:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Contributor's note: I read once that historically there really were rumors of a Battousai that helped bring down the shogunate; can anyone verify this?)

You may be thinking of Kawakami Gensai, whom Kenshin is partly based on. And are you sure that you don't mean Hitokiri (Man Slayer)? "Battousai" is in reference to one who is skilled the art of attacking while drawing a sword. --Paul Soth

---

"No, it wasn't due to the popularity of X-Men, but rather to cash in on the belief that all anime is porn. And that's why we decided to call it Samurai X."

-"Carl Macek," This is Otakudom --Paul Soth 05:03, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Concerning the comment about the 2nd OVA

"Creator Nobuhiro Watsuki also concurs with his fans and states that this OVA did not portray the ending he foresaw for Kenshin, stating that he enjoys happy endings best." I have not heard of Watsuki stating this about the OVA itself. Rather, he stated that although he had planned for Karou's actual dead (instead of the 'fake' death), he thought it was not appropriate to give it a tragic ending after the Kyoto Arc, and that is why he changed it to the ending it is now. Unless he has stated he was not happy with the OVA somewhere else, this comment is untrue. (and as a side note, I, for one, liked the OVA =p) itakoaya

I read online that Watsuki wrote in his free talk page in volume 28 that he disliked the OVA. Watsuki meant for the story to have a happy ending. I can't agree that he would like having this tragic ending tacked on to his story by Sony Studios. Jinchuu Crusader 17:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Edit by Summoner Lenne: It was said in the panel with him at the Anime Expo 2002 when a fan asked.

Maybe Watsuki said that in an interview? (The manga was finished in 1999 and the 2nd OVA was released in 2002. Watsuki couldn't possibly write in his free talk page in volume 28 that he disliked the OVA.) Nlf7 05:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The OVA confused me but I believe it began with a Kenshin that was becoming weak due to the strain put upon his small body that wasn't fit to handle the Hiten Mitsuryugi swordmanship and that he tumbled off the ship on his way back to Japan from Korea. Since he wasn't returning, Karou was worried and had a series of flashbacks including the Jinchuu arc in the story. It is possible that that is when they live happily as put in the manga. They live as a happy couple and become parents soon afterwards but when he finally gave up his sword to Yahiko, he began helping in the wars in Korea and picked up a disease there. He came home half-dead and finally dies in the arms of Kaoru.

It's just a little thing but.. I believe Kenshin picked up the disease in some previous place (that is, before leaving for the war in the OVA). In Kaoru's flashback, he returned to her already carrying the disease, and it is implied he also passed it on to her. So by the end of the OVA, not only did Kenshin died, Kaoru is also dying from the diease she had caught from him. I know a lot of people hate the OVA, but I think it does give a realistic (too realistic, one may argue) version of their future. Kenshin has always been an idealist, this along with his nature to help others make it all the possible. I think people fail to see the thoughts that had been put into creating this OVA.

I think he was going around Japan helping people instead not with his sword, but near those disease-filled places. But I am sure he got it after he gave his sword to Yahiko. And Kaoru will die soon afterwards but hey, they lived a happy life.

Concerning the 'Technically made up' name 'rurouni'.

I read that it was not so much deliberately made up as mistakenly thought to be an existing word. However I no longer remember where I came across this in the first place. Does anyone have anything to back-up / deny this possibility? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HotondoNaNashi (talk • contribs)

It comes from the Japanese Romanji version word of "rurounin" (流浪人 / るろうにん) which means wanderer. Or at least, when I checked JEDI - Japanese-English Dictionary Interface. -- AllyUnion (talk) 10:41, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Iyouboushi adds:

Just thought I'd add the following: rurouni was originally a modified version of the word rounin (which means masterless samurai). However, last I checked the dictionary, the word "rurouni" (るろうに/流浪人) shows that it's shortenend from るろうにん, which does mean wanderer. I don't know if this was added into the dictionary after Kenshin came around or not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iyouboushi (talk • contribs)

In some countries,however, even the TV series was called SamuraiX. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.196.133 (talk • contribs)

"Rurouni" is definitely not a Japanese word. It's actually two: 流浪 (rurou, meaning "vagrancy; wandering; nomadism") and に (ni, the particle). Whoever did the translating was lazy and didn't separate the two words for the English title, and now it's too late for them to correct it. --nihon 20:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Ja-Wiki says it's a noun made up by the creator, not noun + particle. That's really what it sounds like, too. --Bakuryuu 14:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Possible vandalism from 203.20.229.2

There were several sections missing due to an edit made by 203.20.229.2. I think I've corrected most of them, but for those who watch this page more than I do, please check them over. Thanks! --AllyUnion 08:34, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Naming

We should be having names based on the spelling in the Viz manga. WhisperToMe 21:21, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No, I think the traditional Eastern way is fine, so long as we note it at the beginning of the article. Rurouni Kenshin, as it stands, has been out long to be a popular fan classic way before Viz ever licensed the manga. Switching to Western just because Viz has the license and it's being republished by Viz makes no sense to me. I suspect some of this information might be transwikied from the Japanese version of the entry. --[[User:AllyUnion|AllyUnion (talk)]] 12:35, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Allyunion, the Viz manga uses the Eastern way, because this is a historical manga. WhisperToMe 03:12, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

What I meant was that the wapuro style that was used in the article should be replaced by macrons. Sure enough, they were. WhisperToMe 04:06, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Time to Split?

The character descriptions are becoming so large that I think it may be a good idea to follow the examples of other articles on other series and split off the descriptions into their very own separate article, such as what was done with Evangelion and Love Hina. If necessary, other subcategories could be created as well. --Paul Soth 04:54, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Done. WhisperToMe 06:30, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The split in the data has now resulted in a lot of overlap in data. I don't think that the article, Rurouni Kenshin main characters has any information that isn't already within the individual character's main page, or in the main Rurouni Kenshin article. My personal opinion is that the main characters article should be removed, and a listing of main characters be added to the main Rurouni Kenshin article with links to the individual character pages. Js2756 17:35, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)

Oro?

Kenshin's use of the word "Oro?" is not as nonsensical as the main page suggests. I'm told it's an archaic form of the word "Ara?" which you hear semi-frequently through out other anime. It does express surprise and confusion, as suggested in the article- meaning the same as "Huh?" or "Whatchu talkin' about, Willis?" ...Maybe not that far, but... Seriously, it's not a nonsense word.--Michuru July 8, 2005 04:53 (UTC)

-I read somewhere the Watsuki got the word 'Oro' from some comedian.

Watsuki got the word 'Oro' and the name 'Kenshin Himura' from his favorite comedian 'Ken Shimura'.--Blackzero 20:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

heard that oro mean sorry or excuse me dont know where from though

Template

I've recently created and added a Rurouni Kenshin template to most of the Rurouni Kenshin-related articles. If you have any questions or comments please contact me on my talk page. --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:11, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Link Spam

I removed some of the more commercial/possibly illegal links. Maybe a couple more could be trimmed. Kyaa the Catlord 14:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Ikedaya

Since I've explained this one to people nearly 100 times, please let me leave a note here. The Kyoto Arc does not begin with a battle at the Ikedaya (lunar calendar 6.5.1864). Kenshin does not have the complete cross-shape scar till Dec (lunar calendar), 1864 and the name of the inn is in fact listed in the anime. (I could not read that, but I could read "Ikedaya.") One could also get several clues from the conversation at the inn. Nlf7 00:27, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Controversy isn't not a controversy. + Viz's mistranslation.

The "controversy" over the anime should be reworded. There is no controversy there. Anime is constantly changed or has new stories written specifically for it. During the Shishio Saga in the anime, the manga had just finished the final battle and started the Jinchu arc. As Watasuki had not finished writing the entire arc, it would be near impossible for the anime to continue on that arc with out making something up, so instead anime audiences got the random stories that we got including arc where Kenshin is blinded. This is common practice, anime often diverges from manga at the point it over takes it. Negima does it in the final episodes of the first season with an Asuna story. FMA is completely on it's own from the Greed fight on (manga version has the Furher fight Greed). So rewording is good, rewriting to illustrate the specific endings of both versions is better. --Kinglink 20:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

On the other hand there is a slight controversy over Viz's translation. Here's the big one, concerning Kenshin The Japanese panel in question can be foundhere. This is more worthy of note.--Kinglink 20:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

East Asian age reckoning

In the RK universe, everyone's age goes by East Asian age reckoning. (Kenshin's age goes by Western standards though.)

Kenshin's DOB: June 1849

Kaoru's DOB: June 1862

Sano's DOB: Feb 1860

Megumi's DOB: Dec 1857

Aoshi's DOB: Jan 1853

In Meiji 11 (1878), Kaoru's 15 by western standards and 17 by East Asian age reckoning (during the Tokyo Arc); Sano's 18 (in Feb 1878) by western standards and 19 by East Asian age reckoning; Megumi's 20 by western standards and 22 by East Asian age reckoning.

If anyone has doubts, please get a copy of Kenshin Kaden. Seven 03:01, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Origin of ADV's Samurai X

The article does not seem to be entirely accurate concerning the reason ADV created the name "Samurai X"

"The name Samurai X was created to be used as an international name for the Rurouni Kenshin series, it is used for many different versions of the series. ADV Films' English language release of the OVA's..."

According to representative Matt Greenfield in A-Kon 2000, "The Samauri X title was chosen to tie into the mainstream market. Sony will be marketing it on TV, etc, with that title and ADV wanted to take advantage of their marketing machine by tying in the dub. The sub packaging will be different and will have Japanese on the box to make it clear. Matt said that having two titles is actually a pain in the ass but they wanted to increase business (hence Samauri X on the dub) and also please the hardcore fans (hence Rurouni Kenshin on the subs)."

Source: http://www.animeondvd.com/conitem.php?item=143

someone check on whether this conflicts with the current state of the article Kei-clone 02:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

ADV did not create the name Samurai X, Sony did. Sony began using the name Samurai X long before ADV even released the OVA's. ADV had a choice, and they went with Samurai X. 66.66.99.93 18:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Datchi

can't there be more than one forum link?

i put a link to a forum that is about ruroni kenshin and other but someone took it a out becuase the person says there is already a forum link but can't there be more than one?

 the link that was linked -link taken out, wouldn't allow saves-   User:hotspot

• There can be more than one forum linked, but the when I looked at the forum I didn't see much in the Rurouni Kenshin section or anythign that could really help someone researching or trying to find out more about RK. The forum currently linked contains FAQs, media information and other such things, but this one did not and hence did not fit the criteria of the type of forum that it makes sense to link from Wikipedia. Katsuhagi 03:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I realize you want to promote your forum, however linking it in an encyclopedia read by people around the world looking for information is not the best way to do it. I hope you understand.Katsuhagi 03:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

okay , i understand that. User:hotspot

Jinchu Arc controversy

It seems this section was made with to sole purpose to tell about fans opinion on the OVA series. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be about facts concerning a certain theme (in this case Rurouni Kenshin series) and not about fans opinion and assumptions. Also this seccion is redundant since there's already some lines about fans reaction on the OVA in the storyline section:

"There is a great deal of debate regarding the second OVA. Many fans completely ignore this OVA and disagree with the ending that was given in it. Creator Nobuhiro Watsuki also concurs with these fans and states that he enjoys happy endings best."

Thus I'm cutting the section from the article. Kazu-kun 04:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• I disagree slightly. While the opinion bit is not appropriate I think perhaps having it like this would be approprate:

The television series and manga series of Rurouni Kenshin up to the end of the Kyoto Story Arc, had been nearly identical in terms of plot with only minor differences. However, when the television series caught up to the manga in terms of story, the producers of the Rurouni Kenshin anime decided to diverge from Nobuhiro Watsuki's manga and create their own story and characters (ie filler) until they had enough material to adapt without catching up. The last arc of Rurouni Kenshin manga, the "Jinchū" story arc has only been animated in OVA form.

The Jinchū arc contains a large amount of Himura Kenshin's backstory including the meeting of his first wife and the events that resulted in his infamous cross-shaped scar. The story arc is primarily focused on characters from Kenshin's years spent as the Hitokiri Battōsai, who now want vengeance for wrongs he once did to them. The Jinchu arc also has a stronger romantic theme to it. Katsuhagi 11:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Ok, that could work, though the title should be changed from "Jinchu Arc controversy" to just "Jinchu Arc". You may add it if you want. Kazu-kun 16:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Alright. I definately think that trimmed down that section is still useful, since it is true that it was never fully animated. Katsuhagi 19:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Dubai TV

Please be advised: A vandal (IP1 IP2 IP3) has made an edit to this page which has not been reverted. See here. If this fact cannot be verified independently, it's suggested that you remove it. His word alone cannot be trusted given his contribution history. –Gunslinger47 04:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

I found a more trustworthy source. He says Dubai TV only carries Case Closed. I'm removing the link. –Gunslinger47 00:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Merge discussion per AfD

Per discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakabato, the Sakabato article needs to be merged into this one. Please discuss the best way to do so, and then merge the article and redirect it here. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nihonjoe (talk • contribs) 22:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC).

Should it be merged into the Himura Kenshin article instead? Seven 23:40, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it should... sakabato isn't an item 100% unique to Rurouni Kenshin, as it is a real type of sword. Small subdivision as it may be, it is still a unique type of sword. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.95.11.28 (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC).

The 'sakabato' was invented by the creator of the manga. It has zero historical basis, and is not used in any martial arts. This was discussed in the AfD discussion. See: [1]; [2]; [3]. --Oroshi 00:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Why is there even a Fictional swords category if a fictional weapon does not deserve its own page? Seth0708 01:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Because swords like Excalibur are fictional, but are very widely known. I suggested the page be deleted because, based on the contents of the page, no-one knows what they are talking about in relation to it. Half the sentences claim it as a real weapon, the other half denounce it as fake, and none of them have citations. Also, the only real mention of the weapon in use (note: weapon, not tool like the reverse blade Nata (hachet) or the other reverse bladed tools and ceremonial items) comes from the Kenshin anime/manga. Since there is little discussion of what/when/how the blade actually was used, and what little there is constantly contradicts itself, it does make sense for the minute amount of information dealing with the weapon to be moved into another article as:

1. It does not, and, after being through an AfD debate, appears that it cannot, have enough information written about it to make a substantial article that stands on its own.

2. The information that has been written about it is all very contradictory, making it look as if a historical perspective was originally written, then interspersed by a fanboy who presented other historically inaccurate information about it as a (poor) counter.

3. There are no citations anywhere.

That's my view. Ox-Puller 14:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Is there any evidence manga originated the idea and didn't base it on a factual weapon? I've been told (by people in weapon retail) that reverse blade swords were ceremonial and not functional weapons (that pre-date Ruroni Kenshin ), and I'm assuming that my source has a source. Eno-Etile 05:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

According to an interview with Nobuhiro Watsuki, RK's Sakabato was his creation and he didn't base it on a factual weapon. I'm assuming that the ceremonial reverse blade swords were not katanas. Seven 08:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah. well then my argument is crap.Eno-Etile 20:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

It occurred to me to point out that I've edited the article to remove any spurious or unrelated information, but as my area is swords and not manga, I'm not in a good position to merge it. I know very little about Rurouni Kenshin. Hopefully someone who's familiar with the manga can do the merge itself. I hope I've made that task a little easier. Oroshi 21:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Although it is a fictional weapon, originally made for this manga, it has been featured in a few other anime as well as some games. Ill try to find some links later, but i distinctivly remember there being reversed balde katanas in another manga I've read. I propose changing the name of the article to something that is a more broad term (reverse blade sword/reverse blade katana?) and then having the majority of the info about kenshin's sword, but also some other info such as what the Zanbato page is like. NeilHynes - Talk - Contributions - 23:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Movie and OVAs

There was a request for movie and ova articles to be created in the anime/manga wikiproject so I created stubs and added the links in this article.--88wolfmaster 03:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Last Blade not needed

It's a bit jumpy to put Last Blade as an influence on Kenshin. In reality, it can be viewed the other way around. Kenshin ended in 1999 folks, and most (if not ALL) the characters introduced within manga canon between 1994-1999, to the best of my absolute memory, never gives a reference to Last Blade nor introduces any noteworthy characters. that can be seen as introduced from the Last Blade series (winter 1997-1999). Again, as many speculate/view, Last Blade can be seen a homage to Rurouni Kenshin just as Watsuki was influenced by Samurai Shodown.

If you find a specific page in the manga that acknowledges last blade (really, even though the manga does, these ALL need their specific citations) feel free to cite it. Otherwise, to the best of my knowledge there is no reason to support this. 07:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Especially so considering that now the Last Blade article cites Kensin as one of the inspirations, creating a sort of loop. Last Blade should be removed here, unless someone can come up with a citation for this, which seems unlikely. --Bakuryuu 14:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Detailed Plot Summary

Someone just added a detailed plot summary under the manga section...i think that we should create a new page devoted solely to the plot....what does everyone think?--88wolfmaster 01:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Too much plot may be a copyright violation. Please try to condense the plot.-Malkinann 07:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I personally think the plot summary is too long, and needs to either be moved to a different page or gotten rid of. Katsuhagi 15:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I went ahead and created a new page. i tried to setup Plot of Rurouni Kenshin as much as possible.--88wolfmaster 18:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

One Piece Reference?

I just wanted to point out that in chapter 161 page 54, on the bomb there is the Jolly Rojer of an Anime called One Piece. However, this may just be a joke put in by the translators I am using. Could someone please confirm this for me? I thought it would be a fun little fact to put in the trivia section of the page. 71.118.91.149 02:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Trivia sections are to be avoided, not enlarged. --Bakuryuu 17:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kenshin Apothecary.JPG

Image:Kenshin Apothecary.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

In Case Anyone Needs It

I own the entire anime and both OVA movies and have a good DVD program with snapshots, so if you ever need me to get some images onto photobucket or something...just ask.Narcotics faerie 20:13, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Chapters and Volumes

Does anyone believe that there should be a separate article that shows the names of the volumes, names of the chapters, and which chapter is a part of which volume and any extras that are included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.172.239 (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Jinchuu

Why are we leaving out the Jinchuu arc?! As far as many fans (myself included) are concerned, the Jinchuu arc was the best part and Seisouhen was a poor attempt to put it in two episodes' time.

Iyouboushi adds: I agree. There should be a section here that talks about the overview of the Jinchuu Arc. It is, indeed, the best arc in the entire series. The problem becomes that it requires a knowledge of TsuiokuHen (the first OAV; which was derived from the pages in the Jinchuu Arc where Kenshin talks about his past) and since the Jinchuu Arc isn't available in English it's a little hard to talk about it. SeisouHen IS out in English and thus people who don't know better seem to think that the Jinchuu Arc displayed in SeisouHen is the way it truely happened. :\ Anyway, if someone sets up the catagories and characters I will be more than happy to help supply information for them all.

I added a column on Jinchuu. Personally I feel Kyoto arc is the best but Jinchuu was awesome and I regret never being be able to see that animated especially Mummiyou, I love that guy. I hate the OVA because it completley changes the character designs and feel of the tv series. I think the manga depiction of Jinchuu is the best one to rely on.

The style of the OVA's were completely different from the anime style. And this goes for all OVA's, not just Jinchuu.

Edit by Samehanda

                      Actually, there is a rotating online manga with downloads that can be located here:

http://www.thespectrum.net/manga_scans/rurouni_kenshin/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samehanda (talk • contribs) 02:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Genres

Per this discussion over at the Samurai Champloo talk page, I've changed the genre to Chanbara. Also, I've removed the Category:Meiji Restoration. Giving it a once-look-over, I found the category is used for important figures and events of the Restoration, not fictionalized accounts.--Nohansen (talk) 02:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Anime and Manga seperate articles?

Does anyone think that the manga and anime should be sepearte articles? Especially when it comes to Jinchuu because the Samurai X OVA's and the manga versions of Jinchuu are pretty different.

Quotes

If you wish to include quotes, put them in Wikiquotes and link there, don't place them in the main article. --Js2756 July 6, 2005 12:58 (UTC)

Powerful looking HiKo

I like Hiko. He doesn't look weak as other skinny , girly sowrdsman. He looks very mighty and particularly muscular, just like a gaur:

http://www.indianaturewatch.net/displayimage.php?id=2540

So regret that he doesn't fight any good fight in the story.

Saito as Main Character

Under main characters, it lists Saito, but the link is to the real person. Under minor characters it lists him as an enemy. Shouldn't a page for him be created and that should be listed under main characters?

Article Cleanup

The RK article is looking better, but still needs some work. In particularly, a lot of break outs were done that are unnecessary and give undue weight to certain aspects of the series, in addition to violating the MoS. I'd recommend the OVAs and Movie articles be merged back here, as well as the Media list (cleaned up) and Brilliant Collection. The character section needs some formatting work, either using a bulleted with short descriptions, or a prose summary of the characters. The List of minor Rurouni Kenshin characters needs a LOT of clean up and cleanout, renamed properly to List of Rurouni Kenshin characters and modified to actually include all charaters, including a merge in of a cleaned up version of List of Rurouni Kenshin villains (which is an NPOV/OR name). The novel table is missing basic release info, and of course much more sourcing is needed all over. Yahiko no Sakabatō needs to be tightened up and moved under the manga section, and more added to it than just a plot summary. When was it released in Japan? Etc. Thoughts on these suggestions? Volunteers to tackling parts? There really is no reason RK can't be finished up and taken to GA or FAC with a bit more work! :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

For one, the lists should be merged into List of Rurouni Kenshin characters. Any [extremely] minour characters should be cut or referenced together in a "minour characters" section. Think there's a better chance for WP:FA if this is done. Then again, I could be wrong. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. That's what I meant (I'm doing bad at my phrasing today LOL). :) AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Did you want assistance combining the lists? I'm a bit busy watchlist surfing ATM so I might do some general fixes when I'm done. Oh, did you read my latest comment on your talk page? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Might have missed it. I think 3 or 4 folks left comments all at once :P It would be good if someone else could tackle it, or at least get it going. I'm still working on the List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters list (on the last round of merges before peer review and an eventual FL attempt). :P AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I was supposed to work here last weeks but I was busy with Fullmetal Alchemist. Consider I have never worked in a series article thats why Im a slow. I agree with the all those merges. I promise I will try to keep the clean up.--Tintor2 (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

About the characters articles (Yahiko, Sanosuke, Saito, Aoshi and Misao) I will try to clean them. Tomoe and Kenji Himura could be merged easily in one of these lists, while Im starting to think that i cant do anything Megumi.--Tintor2 (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

And the villains? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes, the villains^_^. I will also look for them.--Tintor2 (talk) 14:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Heh, would Saito and Sanosuke have a tiny section in the arcticle? Also, should we do a seperate villians section for the anime and manga? Necroed (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Saito, probably no. Sano is already in the main article. r do you mean the list? The list will have both, of course, and the other major characters. We don't separate the characters between manga and anime, no is a villain section appropriate. The villains list it is a misnamed list that needs to be fixed as it is a non-neutral (and false) label that will be merged into the new single character list. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Infoboxes

I removed the infoboxes for Requiem for the Ishin Patriots, Trust & Betrayal and Reflection because the three have their own articles and the infoboxes automatically add media categories (e.g. OVA infobox adds Category:Anime OVAs). So, unless the features in question are covered extensively in this article (read: merged here and redirected), having infoboxes here and there unnecessarily inflates the media categories and this article's infobox.--Nohansen (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I've put them back. The OVA and movie articles really need to merged back here anyway, as they are not significantly different from the main series to warrant separate articles (and roughly planned as part of its over all on-going clean up). Also, people looking for RK will end up here first, and having stand alone articles does not mean excluding them from the infoboxes as we are then not including complete information. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, {{Infobox animanga}} says "if, for example, separate pages exist for an anime and its associated movie, the movie component should not appear on the anime page, and vice versa. The "Other" component may be used to provide links to such closely related works." In the meantime, I'm removing them for the reasons I gave and the infobox's usage instructions. If the separate articles are merged here, they can be easily restored.--Nohansen (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Sigh. As you wish, though as per below at least some merging will be done, so it would have been nice if you'd have left the one being merged in. But ah well...will just put back when the merge is done. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Merges

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Resolved

 – Samurai X The Motion Picture, Rurouni Kenshin media, and Brilliant Collection merged per consensus. Samurai X: Trust & Betrayal and Samurai X: Reflection left as stand alone articles to allow for continued expansion

As I mentioned earlier, I feel several of the sub-articles of Kenshin should be merged back here. I've now done the appropriate tagging and am starting this discussion to get the ball rolling. I'm adding subsections below for each one so discussions can be kept separate. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I'd agree with all of these, so just going to reply here. The first OAV is the only one I could really see deserving an article of its own, and that would require significant expansion (ie, production/development information) that clearly hasn't happened. Probably better off merging it back in at this point. Doceirias (talk) 05:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

It's been over a month. How much longer will this discussion remain open? I ask because Elfen Lied split discussion was closed after two weeks without comments.

But, just in case, I believe the OVAs should remain separate. They're significantly different from the manga and TV series; not only in plot, but style too.--Nohansen (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

All of the merges with consensus have been done I believe. The two OVAs had no consensus for merge and will remain separate (though hopefully cleaned up. I'll fix the merge tags -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 06:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Samurai X The Motion Picture

Per the MoS, Samurai X The Motion Picture is not significantly different from the series, and it does not need its own article. There really isn't much in the current article that isn't already in this one except the summary (and this article has the refs that is missing) and a low quality image. It would be extremely easy, and appropriate, to merge it here. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Pretty straightforward merge. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge.Tintor2 (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Note: Merge of this one is completed.Tintor2 (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Samurai X: Trust & Betrayal

Again, per the MoS, the Kenshin OVAs are not significantly different from the main series to warrant its own article. It, again, is pretty much just plot summary with relatively useless "ratings" tables. Better reception information for the OVAs is already here, and well sourced, so really just need to add in a much shorter summary, and merge back here. The four OVA episodes should also be added to List of Rurouni Kenshin episodes. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This one I'm more conflicted on I think we can keep. It's gotten extremely positive reviews from practically every piece of reception I've seen ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8], this was from a very brief search), and a good sized reception section could be written in. I think conception information is on the DVD release, so I think all bases are covered. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Samurai X: Reflection

Pretty much all the same reasons as Trust & Betrayal. It isn't significantly different, primarily just an article with an extended plot summary, and has little sourced information. Easily mergeable back here, and again its two episodes need to be added to the List of. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I can drag out the same reception stuff as for the above OVA. It can stay. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Rurouni Kenshin media

This inappropriate break out needs to be brought back in, with significant cleaning. It has little content of value and is basically acting as a place to shove in huge discographies (which do not belong in anime or any other article except "maybe" a CD article (and even that's been debated in some circles). It is completely lacking in references and has a lot of lists that need to be changed to prose, so would take the most work. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Pretty clear merge and trim. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

MergeTintor2 (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Note: Merge has been completed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Brilliant Collection

This CD completely fails WP:MUSIC and should not have its own article. Merging here depends on the merging of the media. If for some reason media isn't merged back, then the CD should be merged there. AnmaFinotera (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge as well. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

MergeTintor2 (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Note: Merge of this one is completed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Improving character articles - PLEASE use Watsuki's "The Secret Life of Characters"

Those of you notice that Watsuki discusses creation of characters, right?

PLEASE use those tidbits to source info about characters! They make articles better! WhisperToMe (talk) 00:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunetely, how many people really do edit the Rurouni Kenshin articles? I doubt there is too little interest to make a work group, and others most likely edit other articles than the ones related to Rurouni Kenshin.--Hanaichi 02:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

There seem to be enough people. Either way, it is a good idea to remind people of sources that can be found in bookstores :) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Am I butting in? I like the series but I never edited the article due to few Rurouni Kenshin tankobon I have. I wish to help. Enterprise-1701e (talk) 01:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

• By all means, please get the books and use them to add info about the characters! WhisperToMe (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

What, exactly, does Watuki say there? It escapes me how he could have used Last Blade, released in December '97, as inspiration for Kensin or Sisiô, who both apparently appeared way before. --Bakuryuu (talk) 02:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

• He says many things - See, each volume of Rurouni Kenshin has at least one "The Secret Life of Characters" profile. Each profile is for each character. Major and minor characters get profiles. I have already used many of the profiles and sourced them. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay, but the statement I'm referring to is sourced to Kensin and Sisiô chapters. Both of these characters made their appearance before Last Blade came out. All in all, as most Last Blade characters are ripped from Kensin anyways (with the exception of, hmm, Akane and Hibiki?), I don't see how Watuki would have much inspiration to draw from them. Which is why I found the whole statement somewhat dubious and wanted to know exactly what the sources say. However, I cannot easily access the English renditions of the comic, I was hoping someone would explain the relevant parts. Alternatively, I could get my hands on the Japanese versions rather easily, so if these profiles also appear in the original tankôbon, I could check that out. --Bakuryuu (talk) 07:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I have the entire series, and checked those. They were false sources. I removed the whole thing as OR and unnecessary. Not something that would have belonged in that section anyway, but rather in the individual character articles that are notable enough to have them, and in the production section where it can be accurately sourced. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 08:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Character Article Names

I just noticed that all of the Rurouni Kenshin articles are giving the character names in the original Japanese order, with family name first. Per WP:MOS-AM and WP:MOS-JP, the character articles should be named in Western order, and all characters should be referred to in Western order throughout the series article. I really can't see any valid reason for violating all three MoS/guidelines, as these are not real historical figures and don't meet that one exception. Thoughts on whether the articles should all be renamed and this corrected? In either case, I think their leads all need to be fixed to stop saying "known as X in the English dub" when its simply changing the name to the Western order rather than a true rename. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

No idea, perhaps a discussion was held a long long long time ago? Maybe because the people assumed that under MOS JP, characters (in fact its suppose to be real people) born before the first year of the Meiji have their family names first and RK takes place during the Meiji, and the characters were all born before the rule of the Meiji. However, I see problems with Saito's name because it conflicts with the real Hajime Saito page. --Hanaichi 15:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

It seems that was discussed a long time ago here.Tintor2 (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Yep, from the old discussion people did seem to incorrectly decide to apply the MOS JP rule to fictional characters. I think it should definitely be revisited, particularly since that discussion wasn't exactly a productive/polite one :P For Saito, his page is already disambiguated, so it would just be moving the current Saitō Hajime (Rurouni Kenshin) to its redirect of Hajime Saito (Rurouni Kenshin) :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I see. Should we do something before moving them? For now, we only are 3 users supporting the change.--Tintor2 (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

For now, just let the discussion run awhile, see if there are any objections. Might also be good to get the main character list up and maybe get some of the merges done (then there would be fewer to deal with :P) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I prefer using the FN-GN order because the series is a period piece and that the English language manga uses FN-GN. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Okay...so you feel we should disregard both MoS? The period piece isn't a particularly valid argument, as the MOS JP guidelines are specifically for real people, not fictional characters in a heavily fictionalized Meiji period. The latter, however, could be argued as "most common name" though the MoS AM does not give an exception on Western order for when the English licensor's do not use it. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Collectionian, I am already aware that neither MOS explicitly has a section on fictional character names, so there is wiggle room. One could apply the "Pre-Meiji" conditions to RK since that series takes place in the Meiji period, where most people have FN-GN order names as known in English. If you want to have a more clear-cut say on character names, why not consult the Anime and Manga MOS talk page? WhisperToMe (talk) 01:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

If yu are aware that there is no exception noted, why do you feel it should apply in this case? And I already left a note with the project informing them of the discussion, as I do with many such discussions. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing that explicitly says "For fictional characters" in terms of MOS. My way of interpreting a scenario is this: if you follow the MOS for people and use it for fictional characters, Kenshin and co. would use FNGN because they were in the "real" world and born before 1868. However it may be best for the Manual of Style people on both sides to decide. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

That's the thing. They are fictional characters. They were never born in the real world. At best, you could say they were "born" when the series was created, which was certainly not before 1868. I already left a note at the AM project, but perhaps a note to MOS JP would also be good. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Except that it is set "in our world" - As in you see people like Okubo Toshimichi - It is a "period" piece portraying an era that actually happened and mixed it with fictional details, characters, and techniques. Collectionian, this is a matter of interpretation. This is why the MOSes need to specifically address fictional characters somehow. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

For me either way is fine, but I think it makes sense to keep the names as they are (family name first) since the series is a period drama whose characters (some of them actual historical figures) were born before the Meiji era. Also, that's the way the names appear in Viz's release. It's just easier that way. Also, to dispel any confusion, the articles could use {{Japanese name}} to make sure readers understand which is the "family name".--Nohansen (talk) 05:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Just to add a further note here... it seems to me that since the series is set in "the real world", and does involve (peripherally at least) some historical figures, it makes sense to stick with the naming convention for real people. If you don't, and if you set the fictional characters by different standards than the real ones, you end up with confusion: some of the names will be FN-GN, some will be GN-FN (this wouldn't be that big a deal in Kenshin, because it doesn't involve any historical figures in primary or secondary roles, but in something else that liberally mixes historical figures with fictional ones it might be chaotic). By contrast, if you set fictional and historical characters by the same standard, you get consistency: all characters in the story are FN-GN, and all production and writing staff are GN-FN... simple, clear. (IMO, the MoS on Japanese naming is going to have to deal with big-time headache issues when you start involving fictional characters that this doesn't even touch on... it might be better to do nothing at all here for now and deal with that first. But if you just have to do something here and now, i'd recommend treating the fictional characters as real ones. Consider what would happen if we were (hypothetically) to rename all the characters GN-FN, then the author comes along and says, "But they are based on real, if obscure, people - i have just dramatized their exploits." Why would a character based on Sakamoto Ryoma deserve a FN-GN and a character based on the author's great-grandma not (especially since she has suddenly been made somewhat notable by having the character based on her and is no longer completely obscure)? Voilà, chaos.) --DarkerStar (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Anyone else's head spinning yet? :-P I've left a note at MoS JP to get clarification on whether the "mythological" exception applies to all fictional characters. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Lead Section

I've reviewed the guidelines provided by Wikipedia and compared them to introduction we have on the article now. I see no problem. Is it time to remove the notice at the top? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guywithmako (talk • contribs) 19:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

No, it is still too short and needs to be rewritten. Please see both WP:LEAD and WP:MOS-AM, as well as some GA and FA series articles, which is the goal of this article. It is not an adequate summary of the article. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

The lead has been edited several times since the previous message, it might be worth reassessing the tag Dandy Sephy (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Samurai X TV series

There used to be commentary on the original English dub for the TV series (the "Samurai X" version still aired in Asia). Where is it now? I think it's still important to general knowledge. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.108.192.48 (talk) 02:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Those are OVAs, not TV series. They both have their own articles which are linked to from the OVA section. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposal

Shouldn't this page be moved to Rurōni Kenshin, per WP:MJ? It specifically states that "all long o and u sounds should be written as ō and ū respectively". Even if the official English title is Rurouni Kenshin, it should still be moved to Rurōni Kenshin.Moocowsrule (talk) 03:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule

Although, we could add "Rurōni Kenshin is advertised as "Rurouni Kenshin"." or something like that... It's just the title should be Rurōni Kenshin...Moocowsrule (talk) 03:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule

No, again, per our MoS we use the official English title and name which is Rurouni Kenshin. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

But MoS is contradicting itself... do we use the official English title? Or do we add macrons? I'm confused...

But you're usually right... so fine.Moocowsrule (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule

We use the official English title. If Viz had retained the macrons, or if there was no official English title, then we would use the macrons. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

???

Shouldn't "Rurouni Kenshin: Enjou! Kyoto Rinne" be "Rurouni Kenshin: Enjō! Kyoto Rinne"? Moocowsrule (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule

Yes, it should. Fixed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

"Rurouni" or "Rurou ni"

Could Rurouni be related to "流浪に" (Rurō ni, Rurō=wander; nomad, ni=particle, creating "Wandering"; "Nomadic")? moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 01:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

No idea, but its written Rurouni so not sure it matters, article wise. I suspect you are right, though, from the literal translation of it. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure it's intended to be "Rurouni", per the Media Blasters and Viz titles. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

It's written in hiragana in Rurouni Kenshin, and "Rurou ni Kenshin" probably wouldn't look as good as "Rurouni Kenshin". moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 01:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

I was wondering because in the article it says "Rurouni Kenshin is subtitled "Wandering Samurai" in some English releases, as a rough translation of "Rurouni.", which is pretty untrue, as it's actually a translation of "Rurō ni", and in the Nihongo... box thingy it should be "Rurō/Rurou ni" not "Rurouni"... moocowsrule^{talk to moo} 01:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Not sure about those particle thingies, but still think "rurouni" is correct. "Ni" being added to nouns does not create adjectives, it is generally a locative postposition (so if we assume that "rurou" = nomad, "rurou ni" is no way "nomadic", it is roughly "on a nomad" which is kinda silly). Adding "ni" to verbs makes even less sense for it is a postposition and should occur after nouns, not after verbs (therefore, if "rurou" = to wander, phrase grammar structure is still incorrect). Btw, ja-wiki says "rurouni" is a merge of "ru" (to wander) and "ronin" (masterless samurai).

And after all this explanation could someone please pay attention to my liiitle, tiiiny unworthy request: I need numbers of chapters for Junchuu arc where "The Secret Life Of Characters" sections occur. I DO NOT need texts/scans/anything else of that kind. Only chapter numbers for the following characters: Gein, Kujiranami, Otowa, Banjin, Yatsume, Higashidani family, Su Shen team. — ru:Ari —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.147.153.24 (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Some of them have already been cited in their respective character articles. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

In the first chapter, Kenshin first introduces himself as 流浪人(furigana reads るろうに) shortly after Kaoru first attacks him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.194.14 (talk) 11:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

What happened to the info on the Opeing and Ending themes?

They used to be here, where did they go?. I'm noticing that in this article and many other articles information about the ending and openings of the series in gone. Wikipedia with its "Let's keep it clean and more encyclopedia-like" policy is becoming less and less informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David13579 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

They are in the episode lists, where they are more appropriate. Kenshin has too many themes to cover them all in the main article, and the article follows agreed consensus and established guidelines such as WP:MOS-AM. Please don't confuse information with quality. Dandy Sephy (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Cover

shouldn't we use to the first cover of the series rather than the last?Bread Ninja (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

The OST1 cover is a bootleg. I think it should be removed or replaced since it may lead people to buy illegal copies without knowing. 95.92.55.128 (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Battousai

I take it Hitokiri Battousai is sworddrawing-genius mankiller? Is that an actual historical name? Cesiumfrog (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

No, it was created by Watsuki.Tintor2 (talk) 13:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Nico Nico Douga

• http://info.nicovideo.jp/seiga/ruroken/

Nico Nico Douga has something involving Ruroken WhisperToMe (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Samurai X Sony dub?

I notice that it doesn't metion the English voice actors in either of the dubs whether it be Media Blasters or Sony. And it doesn't clearly say whether or not the Sony dub of the English anime series was ever released on DVD which is what I really want to know! It should definetely also talk about why the Sony dub of the anime series was never liscenced in America and where that particular dub is being shown today. I beg of you to add in this information because no one else seems to know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.38.128.55 (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

About the Live Action Movie

Shouldn't this page be more updated on that subject? It's been quite a couple of months since the film's release in Japan. Why not talk about the success and reviews preceding the theatrical release? This is probably the juicy stuff people want to know about-- regarding the future of Rurouni Kenshin. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.25.229.61 (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The film wasn't "released" in the USA at the Eiga Film Fest. so much as it was debuted (it showed only once and made my heart break that I didn't get a ticket). There was a petition that went around for a while to try and get the LandMark theaters to get the rights to release the movie nationwide, but that didn't go through unfortunately.71.118.253.218 (talk) 05:33, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Transcription of 浪漫譚

Romance is normally written in katakana as ロマン, however given the author decided to use the kanji writing (浪漫) the correct transcription should be used, that is rōman (ろうまん) and not roman. This should be however settled if anyone can check the furigana used on the original work (did not find it). Also 譚 is a standalone kanji and not part of a jukugo; therefore we write Rōman Tan instead of Rōmantan. Slb 10:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rurouni Kenshin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201233933/http://www.mania.com/rurouni-kenshin-vol-22-end-song_article_81315.html to http://www.mania.com/rurouni-kenshin-vol-22-end-song_article_81315.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080727032541/http://www.mania.com/anime-expo-friday-report_article_86123.html to http://www.mania.com/anime-expo-friday-report_article_86123.html
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/650MabuKW?url=http://www.viz.com/products/products.php?product_id=5865 to http://www.viz.com/products/products.php?product_id=5865
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2006-10-13/japan's-favorite-tv-anime

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Rurouni Kenshin volume 1 cover.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Request.

First volume cover, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.80.247.35 (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Somebody already tried doing that and it was removed. I thought we couldn't have volume 1 due to the way the cover was shown.Tintor2 (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2019 (UTC)