Talk:Safety Not Guaranteed

This article was nominated for deletion on February 7, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives: 1

Plot Issues[edit]

Hi, I disagree with the sentence in the Plot section which states, "Kenneth says his mission is to go back to 2001 and prevent the death of his old girlfriend Belinda, who was killed when someone drove a car into her house." I don't think this is an accurate summary of the events, as in an earlier scene Kenneth makes clear to Darius that he doesn't want to alter events in the past – e.g. saving Belinda – even if it's "for the betterment of future society". Additionally, it's not explicitly said that he wants to "prevent" Belinda's death in this scene either, just that his "reason for going back is a girl". Therefore I believe this summary is jumping to an unfounded conclusion.

Furthermore, I don't think it's ever made clear that Belinda was killed at all. Duplass' performance in this scene suggests Kenneth is deliberately misconstruing the facts, possibly so his reason seems sadder, to match Darius' (and to hide that he's really going back because he still has a crush on Belinda). His performance in the scene near the end when Darius confronts him about the truth about Belinda supports this (his rationalisation that the mission must've been successful seems unconvincing to Darius and the audience). The fan theory that he actually saved Belinda the first time he time traveled can't be proven as we don't know what he did the first time. I believe Belinda's account of the events in the interview was the truth and the only truth: that it was only ever Kenneth that drove the car into her house, not "some jerk in a band", and that she did not ever die. Whether this can be proven or not, I think the ambiguity of this should be communicated more clearly in this synopsis. RhavinBanda (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well in the movie Belinda says "Kenneth ran his car into my boyfriend's house". --Guyver (talk) 12:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sci-fi?[edit]

I don't see a discussion here about categorizing the film as science-fiction as well as comedy, but I believe it should. I mean, doing it spoils the ending, but that's not usually a concern in Wikipedia articles, whereas the ending is unambiguously stating that the time machine was real all along. Kumagoro-42 13:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumagoro-42 (talk • contribs)

Adding sci-fi as the genre is not accurate, and it is not a spoiler either. That the main character believes he has invented a time machine does not change the genre. Also WP:FILMGENRE urges editors to list the primary genre not all genres that could possibly apply. I would have described the film as an amusing indie drama rather than a comedy, but what matters is what the sources say. Sites such as Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic simply label it as a comedy, and list no other genres.[1][2] Variety calls it an "oddball comedy".[3] The Hollywood Reporter refers to it as this "multiplex-friendly comedy about time travel".[4] The New York Times: "a Comedy With a Time Machine"[5] SFGate "comedy"[6] The film may contain some elements of other genres but it seems clear that the main genre is comedy.

Please do not change or modify the genre without first discussing it, and showing reliable sources to support any potential changes. If someone changes the genre again without consensus please restore it to just comedy. -- 109.79.167.143 (talk) 12:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Safety Not Guaranteed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120428202931/http://www.sundance.org/press-center/release/2012-sundance-film-festival-awards/ to https://www.sundance.org/press-center/release/2012-sundance-film-festival-awards/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to the meme?[edit]

Why is there no mention of the original advertisement and the internet-meme, that inspired the film? Also, I believe, that the original author of the advertisement is in the film as a cameo; i.e. one of the people, who open their PO-box. If you want some sources, then here are some: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backwoods_Home_Magazine#%22Safety_Not_Guaranteed%22_classified_ad https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4872697/ https://www.backwoodshome.com/the-time-travel-ad/ --Ælfric of Eynsham (talk) 22:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Someone removed it [7] because they couldn't find it in an online anthology of selected articles from the original magazine. Why they expected an anthology published years later to include the ads is beyond me. 71.204.162.131 (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The magazine reference is in the lead paragraph, but that it was the Internet meme form that primarily inspired the creation of the film has yet to be proven. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]