Talk:San Jacinto River (California)

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

San Jacinto (California) → San Jacinto River (California) – I accidentally created a new article on the river because of a link to San Jacinto (California). The old article is only a single sentence, so I suggest that it be replaced with the new article. I suppose that I could merge it, but I don't think San Jacinto (California) is a useful redirect. If anything, it should redirect to San Jacinto, California. -- Kjkolb 05:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Discussion

Add any additional comments

Done as this was uncontroversial. As you were the only editor, you could have simply merged the content yourself and changed the redirect. older ≠ wiser 13:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can the San Jacinto River be endorheic if it drains to the Santa Ana River via Temescal Creek - albeit rarely - as the article suggests? The article contradicts itself. I suggest removing the endorheic reference from the article. -- User:Adam Kringel