Talk:Sangju Sangmu FC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Korea (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Sangju Sangmu PhoenixSangju Sangmu FC – It was renamed to 'Sangju Sangmu FC'. Korean Wikipedia's article was also renamed to Sangju Sangmu FC(상주 상무 축구단) because of same reason.[1] They are marking '상주 상무 프로축구단'(means Sangju Sangmu FC) at offical web site. Thanks. Min's (talk) 14:43, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Sangju Sangmu PhoenixSangju Sangmu FC - Have to move Sangju Sangmu FC immedialtley, It don't need debate.Footwiks (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge discussion for Gwangju Sangmu FC [edit]

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Gwangju Sangmu FC , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I propose that Gwangju Sangmu FC be merged into Sangju Sangmu FC. The articles are almost identical, and Gwangju Sagmu is even a subheading of the Sangju FC history. Gwangju FC is not related to either and has a completely separate article.

Agree Gwangju Sangmu just changed the team's name to Sangju Sangmu. Not different team.z4617925 (talk) 14:30, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose. Gwangju Sangmu FC and Sangju Sangmu FC is officially different club by K League. Not the just change club name. Sangju Sangmu FC is founded on 2011. You can check out the official founding year at K League website.

http://www.kleague.com/kr/sub.asp?avan=1006010000&league_id=2&team_id=K23& Yes, of course, Two clubs has same root from Sangmu-Korea Armed Forces Athletic Corps. But K League's policy is Sangmu is just player provider. Gwangju and Sangju, two differenent cities are main club control body. So K League separate two clubs.Footwiks (talk) 08:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Discussion So why are the talk pages merged and why are the articles almost identical? A separate legal entity does not necessarily deem a merger not valid, technically Sachsen Leipzig/BSG Chemie Leipzig is good example of convoluted history but enough causation to have one as opposed 3-4 separate articles every time the club reformed. Same goes for many reformed Italian clubs for example. Abcmaxx (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Agree Actually, I opposed in 2014. But I watched Gwangju Sangmu and Sangu Sangmu articles for two years. As I mentioned, Although These club had same root, Offcially, two clubs are different each club by K League policy. But articles are almost same and there isn't effectiveness of keeping two independent.Footwiks (talk) 11:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)