Talk:Secondary payload
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Secondary payload article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Secondary payload. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120707071858/http://andrews-space.com/content-main.php?subsection=Mzc0 to http://andrews-space.com/content-main.php?subsection=Mzc0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 14 July 2020
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Retracted (Not moved). Seeing that in general there is concensus not to move the page and no objection to adding rideshare missions I am retracting my move request and instead spend time to improve Wikipedia. OkayKenji (talk • contribs) 02:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Secondary payload → Rideshare (spaceflight) – With the rise of SpaceX's dedicated rideshare program and Arianespace [1] and others (Spaceflight Industries etc.) could we expand the scope of this article to include dedicated rideshare launches? The article says "secondary payload, also known as rideshare" so presumably if this is named "Rideshare (spaceflight)", we can still include much of the info we have already. I was thinking of creating Draft:SpaceX Smallsat Rideshare Program but if this page is moved we could have a section here about SpaceX's program instead of a dedicated article. Also I'm not sure about the exact name this page should be moved to, if another editor has a better name I'm open to suggestions. OkayKenji (talk • contribs) 22:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Calidum 19:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose – "Secondary payload" is a commonly recognisable name, "rideshare" is not (see WP:COMMONNAME). I am okay to include SpaceX rideshare program (and other rideshare programmes) in this article. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 10:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment — independent of the outcome of the move proposal, there is nothing at all in the way of you (OkayKenji) improving the article by adding well-sourced explication of the other term, rideshare, that seems to now (also) be being used in the industry. So, yeah, go for it. And you don't need any consensus to begin to do that. N2e (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks for the suggestion! Will do soon. OkayKenji (talk • contribs) 04:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. I see no compelling reason to introduce a parenthetical disambiguator into the title. Rreagan007 (talk) 00:42, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.