Talk:Shuttle bus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shuttle bus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Buses Top‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Transport Mid‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion for english variant-discussion open till draft approval

British English- The article was created with british english, in additon the article for Airport bus a type of shuttle bus is written in british english NotOrrio (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this discussion will officially close in favour of keeping british english there were no contests and I had almost singhandedly written the entire draft in british english NotOrrio (talk) 01:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source reviewing

Many of the sources were considerd unreliable because they were either promotional or other wikis i checked through it and the only source i found that didnt fall under such category was Australia Bus and Coach I will crete a full assesement table to see find sources NotOrrio (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source assesment

1.http://www.wikimotors.org/what-is-a-shuttle-bus.htm|

Pros:

-Does present a lot of information

Cons:

-Unreliable- wikisite

Overall Grade:

Unreliable: should be replaced

2. https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm39.htm

Pros:

-Counts towards GNG

-Independant: Run by an independant research insitute

-Reliable: Run by a research insitute

-Sigcov: Main topic is about shuttle buses

Cons:

-Website looks outdated

-Website information may be outdated

Overall Grade:

Good: Website is reliable and counts towards GNG, however looks outdated and information may be outdaded

3. https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/605891387/our-research-report-on-airport-shuttle-bus-market-offers-information-that-is-necessary-for-the-development-of-the-market

Pros:

-Counts towards GNG

-Independant: News article

-Reliable: News article

-Sigcov: Main topic is about the increased market demand of airport buses a type of shuttle bus (maybe partial though)

Cons:

-Couldn't find any

Overall Grade:

Good-Perfect: Couldn't find any cons with this website and the website shows GNG

4.https://www.ptv.vic.gov.au/route/

Pros:

-Reliable Website (run by victorian state government)

Cons:

-Doesnt really serve any purpose but to prove route 601 exists

Overall Grade:

Alright: Reliable source used to prove route 601 exists, however can possibly replaced with an article from monash university about the route instead for example about raid route

5. https://translink.com.au/sites/default/files/acquiadam-assets/timetables/170109-134%2C135%2C145%2C155.pdf

Pros:

-Reliable Website (run by queensland state government)

Cons:

-Doesnt really serve any purpose but to prove route 134 exists

Overall Grade:

Alright: Reliable source used to prove route 134 exists, however can possibly replaced with an article from griffith university about the route instead for example about said route

6. https://www.busnews.com.au/industry-news/1908/skybus-parent-relaunches-as-kinetic

Pros:

-Reliable Website (major australian article about bus transport)

-Does talk about skybus the shuttle bus mentioned in the section

-Potentially partial GNG (indepdant bus article, does talk about skybus an example of a shuttle bus)

Cons:

-Doesnt talk out skybus (the shuttle bus mentioned) alot

Overall Grade:

Alright-good: Source is reliable however main purpose seems to be to prove it exists could be considerd partial for sigcov however I am unsure

7. https://www.welcomepickups.com/paris/charles-de-gaulle-airport-to-city/

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

8. https://tabiparislax.com/en/roissy-bus-complete-guide/

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

9.https://www.mylondon.news/lifestyle/travel/heathrow-londons-most-expensive-bus-23478475

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

10.https://www.busnews.com.au/industry-news/2212/kinetic-continues-transport-investments-in-tasmania-with-new-depot

Pros:

-Reliable

-Mentions the bus in detail

-Can potentially satsify gng partially (both independnant and reliable)

Cons:

-Not much mentioning of the shuttle bus

-In terms of sigcov is half way at best

Overall Grade:

Good- Article contains alot of information and is reliable

11.https://www.discoverlosangeles.com/travel/the-guide-to-lax-flyaway%C2%AE-bus-service

Pros:

-Mentions the bus in detail

Cons:

-Unreliable promotional

Overall Grade:

Unreliable- is promotional and should be replaced

Summary-

Overall there were a few problems with the sources, the major one is that sources 1,7,8,9 and 11 are unreliable and are in dire need of replacement, sources 4 and 5 are reliable but could be replaced with better sources. Notability is doing good with 2 sources showing full notability with 2 potentially being partially notable would likely require 1 or 2 sources though before showing that this article is notable NotOrrio (talk) 12:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]