Talk:Small Fry (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Toy Story characters#Bonnie Anderson|Bonnie]] The anchor (#Bonnie Anderson) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requested move 5 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn. Per the conversation in this discussion, no participants, including myself, agree with the original proposal in its entirety. A new related move proposal has been opened at Talk:Small Fry (song)#Requested move 13 June 2016. Steel1943 (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Small Fry (film) → Small Fry
Small Fry → Small Fry (song)

– The film seems like the obvious primary topic considering that the film article receives more than 35 times the amount of page views as the song article on average. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 20:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator comment: Given the progression of this discussion, the better option would probably be to move Small Fry (disambiguation) to Small Fry. Steel1943 (talk) 23:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: But is the film actually called Small Fry or is it actually Toy Story Toons: Small Fry. Looking at the article it seems to be the latter. PC78 (talk) 11:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, but even if that was true, and Small Fry (film) were to be moved to Toy Story Toons: Small Fry instead, Small Fry should then be set up as a redirect to Toy Story Toons: Small Fry per my WP:PRIMARYTOPIC claim above. Steel1943 (talk) 12:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: IMO a move should never be proposed let alone performed purely based on page view statistics. Page views suggest a primary meaning, but we need to consider other evidence before making any decision. See the problem with page views (and contributions on its talk page very welcome). Andrewa (talk) 20:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then I'll add that the film is probably more notable due to its connection to Toy Story, a widely known film franchise. Either way, the current situation seems like a WP:SURPRISE and probably needs to be remedied with at least the creation of a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving the song to Small Fry (song), but create a dab page at Small Fry. We have three articles (film, song & album) plus a few more similar terms, so that would seem to be the best solution. PC78 (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @PC78: Small Fry (album) doesn't exist. Where is the album subject mentioned on Wikipedia? Steel1943 (talk) 21:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Small Fry (Bing Crosby album), which should probably be moved to Small Fry (album). PC78 (talk) 22:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - Awesome. Moving it doesn't seem controversial given the situation, so I'll go for it myself. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To me, "Small Fry" standing alone means "small fry" means small fishes, or derived metaphorical meanings. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Anthony - The moment I saw the RM I thought of the fishes so I assume moving this would only confuse those who are perhaps wanting to view the fishes article, Tanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Post RM

I'd just like to add that I would support the alternative proposal put by nom above. Move the DAB to the undisambiguated name Small Fry, and disambiguate the song. Andrewa (talk) 02:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See Talk:Small Fry#Requested move 13 June 2016 for a continuation of the above discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]