Talk:Snizhne

Buk missile image

There seems to be no reason to add a particular image of the Buk missile launcher File:Buk-M1-2_9A310M1-2.jpg to the article. The image annotation does not report it to be in Snizhne. — fnielsen (talk) 16:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Such a system was located in this town until recently. (e.g. http://www.buzzfeed.com/maxseddon/locals-say-rebels-moved-missile-launcher-shortly-before-mala) The picture illustrates the accompanying information on the downing of flight MH17 208.118.163.46 (talk) 19:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't matter. Buk launchers and Snizhne have no special connection, whether one was fired from there recently or not. Besides, the Buk picture was taken in Moscow in 2005. Ansh666 07:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox heading format

I have put the names of the city in the infobox into the same format as we use for Dnepropetrovsk. If you disagree, please discuss it here, rather than revert-warring.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Snizhne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110625063924/http://snezhnoe-rada.gov.ua/ to http://snezhnoe-rada.gov.ua/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]