Talk:So Yesterday

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSo Yesterday has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 6, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
December 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Unmerged[edit]

I have just reverted this back to the article. There was absolutely no need to merge with the album. -- Ianblair23 (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Metamorphosis (Hilary Duff album). Extraordinary Machine 16:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

citation needed for this "It has currently sold 8 Million videos" and "In Asia, it received massive airplay by MTV and sold 5 Million videos in India and China alone." Tomba 16:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The song did not make #13 in Japan. A Western artist hardly ever has a hit that large on the Oricon Charts. The song made #13 on the Japanese Imports chart...why does everyone get this confused with the Oricon Top 200...where it didn't even chart, let alone sell 250,000 copies. That was its sales in India. I'm changing this.

Love Interest/Ex in video?[edit]

Does anyone know who plays him, he looks so familiar?! 82.12.239.210 15:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was Ryan Sheckler, and he looks young because he is only 13 in the music video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoelmo (talkcontribs) 18:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Probably Unintentional) Backmasking?[edit]

I may have been watching too much videos about subliminal messaging/backmasking (see YouTube video "Subliminal Messages 6" for this example), but the line "At least not today, not today, not today" backwards sounds eerily alike "Hail this land, hail this land, hail this nazi land". Anything to indicate that this is more than a coincidence? Xavius, the Satyr Lord (talk) 12:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on So Yesterday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on So Yesterday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on So Yesterday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]