Talk:Sogrape
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Requested move 15 November 2017[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) James (talk/contribs) 09:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 | It was proposed in this section that Sogrape be renamed and moved to Sogrape Original Legacy Wines.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log |
Sogrape → Sogrape Original Legacy Wines – Sogrape Group name has change to Sogrape Original Legacy Wines Since December 2016, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/shaping-new-identity-sogrape-portugals-largest-wine-producer-sizaret Nuno Kincaid (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 07:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. No evidence that the shorter name has ceased to be commonly used, just a primary source documenting a change of official name. And in any case, there is no need to disambiguate. Andrewa (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: The suggested form is too cumbersome to expect anyone to use it as the common name, and it also seems promotional. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Note that nom is a single purpose account with an obvious COI, and originally edited under an inappropriate username linked to this topic. They have repeatedly attempted to promote their brand at Wikipedia. This is just more of the same.
We should create a redirect from the proposed target, but that's all. Andrewa (talk) 23:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Edited page to include only factual data[edit]
I deleted an advertising-style company motto, and now the article seems to me to be just factual. But I did not remove the maintenance template (about conflict of interest and advertising) because there remain references to company materials, so the article is not exclusively derived from 3rd party sources.Starlists (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)