This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled[edit]

Can someone please expand this, especially on Sonic Scenarist, their main offering, and add pricing detail, including that of the dedicated hardware editing stations? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.232.65.7 (talk) 23:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

This article reads bias to me. I added the NPOV tag. Please help revise it to a point where it reads more neutral. 12.186.114.19 (talk) 21:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove this section of the discussion page until NPOV dispute is resolved. I had to add it back in.12.186.114.19 (talk) 16:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, to me it reads mostly like the marketing pitch straight from their website. I'm inclined to add the template below. (By the way, I found older revisions that read much more like a proper Wikipedia article. Has someone at Sonic been fooling around with it?) IByte (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to amend; and definitely want to be in keeping with other content on Wikipedia. I don't see how this content is considered bias to be honest though. Everything written is non marketing and factual. Please point out sections that you don't feel are consistent with Wikipedia or any different to other vendors (such as adobe)and I'll gladly revise them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rox123 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where this entry is any more marketing-oriented than any other company profile on Wikipedia. I agree that it is strictly factual in nature and makes no value assertions. Larrytheo (talk) 23:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]