Jump to content

Talk:Southwest Mountains

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject ratings

[edit]

Given the improvements made to this article in the past couple of months, since it was rated "unknown" (by the Geography and Mountain projects) and "stub" (by the Virginia project), I'm flagging it as "start" class, though requesting review by each project, since I've made most of the improvements, and thus am not particularly impartial.--WaldoJ (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the examples given on the Wikiproject Virginia page this article is clearly at least C-Caliber, I have updated is rating as such. Arbogastlw (talk) 17:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Waltons

[edit]

I don't see how Schuyler is part of the Southwest Mountains. It's a little hilly around Schuyler, but if they're on the eastern slope of anything, it's the Blue Ridge. The mountains to the west of Schuyler extend clear to the Shenandoah Valley, while the Southwest Mountains are a ridge that stands alone from the Blue Ridge. This seems like a reference that should be excised. --WaldoJ (talk) 02:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having heard no objection (or support :) after waiting four and a half months, and also having been unable to locate any evidence that Schuyler is considered a part of the Southwest Mountains, I'm going to excise this reference.--WaldoJ (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Improvements

[edit]

After reading a handful of entries for other mountain ranges, here are some improvements that would benefit this entry:

  • description of land ownership (i.e., public vs private)
  • natural features
  • history of development
  • the Peters Mountain facility
  • flora
  • fauna
  • weather
  • tourism
  • physiography
    • age and development in comparison to the Blue Ridge
  • origin of name
  • towns within
  • Jefferson's description of

--WaldoJ (talk) 00:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any or all of the above would be good to add to the article. My initial though was that the article would most benefit from a section on the specific geology (if such information is available), plus something on whatever is known about the history - any native tribes known to have lived there, discovery by colonists etc.--Kubigula (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Southwest Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:49, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Southwest Mountains/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Suggestions for improvement:
  • sections need to be added and expanded on
    • Geology, geography (e.g. lakes, rivers)
    • flora and fauna
    • historical significance - expand on why the NPS declared part of the range as a Rural Historic District
  • a map highlighting its size and location within Virginia and/or USA
  • who where the first explorers to map the range?
  • how did the range get its name and/or any other alternate names for it?
  • any significance to indigenous peoples?
  • wiki link the mountains within the range. One possibility is to create a table of mountains/peaks with their elevation in metres and feet.
  • do not use contractions and try to improve on the grammar as it's a bit choppy in places with somewhat unrelated sentences grouped together in paragraphs.
RedWolf (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)