Jump to content

Talk:Space law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): IHaveLotsOfIdeas.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Early discussion topics

[edit]

Well? What needs cleaned up. This article's been marked since April, but no discussion and cleanup happened. Why was it marked as needing a cleanup? MrZaiustalk 16:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In general, it is really sloppy and poorly-written. -Elmer Clark 07:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the article contained many historical and factual inaccuracies, which I endeavored to correct. User: Wayne White 17:44, 10 August 2006

Changed a little bit of grammar, added some links, broke into sections. Need to find a good picture, not sure what though - maybe one of the U.N. meeting of the Outer Space Treaty? Or just U.N. logo/headquarters, somethign along those lines. Or possibly a picture of a transcript of some space law. Each section may be renamed, I just used the most general beginning for each. I think it's improved over the original article. If enough energy goes into it, it could become a featured article. --Exodio 00:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
@Exodio - This "Space law" Wikipedia page has come a long way since 2006, to the extent that has now become a substantive article. Congratulations to all the editors involved in making it so comprehensive over these decades, including you (Exodio) SMargan (talk) 02:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to put some time in expanding and correcting this article - I'm a space lawyer by education - but I have never before edited a wikipedia article. So if there are any volunteers to mentor me, I'd be very pleased. There is always the considerable possibility that this ends up in my already endless list of todos. BatistPaklons 22:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from article

[edit]

This probably could have been a rvv edit, but just in case..


Actually, although some of the military weaponry discussed (namely, GIANT MOON LASERS) are exaggerated, historically this is largely true. I do question however whether this belongs under Space Law. Perhaps this should be expanded to the legality of military action in space. --Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.172.55.244 (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legality of Giant Moon Lasers

[edit]

The legal debate over Giant Moon Lasers started in the early 1970's during the Cold War. Moon lasers were believed to be a feasible threat at the time, and thus were taken quite seriously. As few agreements were yet to be made in regards to Space Law, none knew what jurisdiction the moon fell under. This lead to numerous legal disputes over usage of the moon for many means including natural resources, and more importantly, military purposes. Both the United States and Soviet government believed the other had schematics for a Giant Moon Laser, however both governments lasers were in purely developmental stages. Due to lack of progress by both governments the threat of Giant Moon Lasers quickly subsided in favor of nuclear weaponry. Although progress was halted during the later years of the cold war, both governments and private companies have recently resumed development on Giant Moon Lasers.

Re-organized

[edit]

I just did a major slice-and-dice on this article, please all check it out and see what you think. I haven't changed any content beyond some rewording, except added a sentence on re-organizing the intro section. Also some treaty inception dates were lost when I merged up Multilateral treaties, in favour of the dates in International treaties. Mostly wikify, space out, un-redundify (new word c. Franamax). I tried to keep the edits separate so each step is more clear.

The article still reads like a block of wood, any ideas to get that -cleanup- tag off the top are welcome! Franamax (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Space patent law

[edit]

A very thorough and informative essay has just been published in The Space Review: Patent rights and flags of convenience in outer space, by Matthew J. Kleiman, February 7, 2011. I read it today and it advanced my understanding greatly. I notice that there is nothing in the current version of the Wikipedia article on the topic of patents at all.

But this matter of law will only get more interesting as we move beyond the ISS—which has a unique special arrangement on patents negotiated into the 1998 "intergovernmental agreement concerning cooperation on the International Space Station"—and Bigelow Aerospace opens up it's new private Commercial Space Station in 2014 with clients from seven different nations, and thus, seven different patent regimes, on board.

So my vote is that space patent law be addressed in the Wikipedia article. But I'm not competent to write it. So hope this source is useful to others. Cheers, N2e (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations

[edit]

Make sure you stay consistent throughout your article with your abbreviation punctuation. Some places you have United Nations as just "UN" and other places as "U.N." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lippmare (talk • contribs) 03:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "UN website" links as reference 2 and 4 are broken. --Oce Eeco (talk) 10:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So our infamous law schools are the ones to declare space ownership?

[edit]

The article notes numerous 'degrees' being given out in this subject - by LAW schools that make LAWYERS. The article also points out that this lawyer "education" is supported by numerous PRIVATE companies in space and telecommunications.

Disclosure: I am in the "space is a public world-heritage asset" camp mentioned in the article.

It seems clear that private companies are planning to take world-heritage property for their own profits, and that they are "creating" the new legal system starting right in the schools. I suggest that law is not supposed to be made by paid-for future lawyers who will then tell us it is not our property!Clarksmom (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a suggestion for improving the article? If not, I will close this thread as soapboxing. Franamax (talk) 02:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

not really soapboxing, yes i feel the article is not clear about such a huge conflict of interest that PRIVATE companies are paying law schools. thanks. Clarksmom (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ownership rights for empty space

[edit]

i made a note in the 'space tourism' section that if private space hotels and stations are put up, they will be 'occupying' public property. this seems to warrant its own mention here in the space law article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.122.94 (talk) 05:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Space law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Space law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Space law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Space law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before 1990

[edit]

Zhukov 1984 is a good source for various points of view and a summary of all the relevant document up to that time: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL5206778W/International_space_law --Nemo 12:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

first allegation of crime in space

[edit]

[1] Maybe someone else can do something with this. It says an astronaut is alleged to have improperly accessed her estranged husband's bank account from orbit aboard the international space station. It talks a little bit about space jurisdiction. 67.164.113.165 (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at James Madison University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Space_law&oldid=1199009126"